Would you like to sign out?

    Bridge

    Advanced Creep Analysis for Two-Span Bridges Explained

    Table of Contents Click the table of contents for details.

    Creep Analysis 5 MIDAS Example 

     

     

    In this article, the previous method explained in Creep Analysis 4 is applied to a real-world bridge and compares the output with MIDAS??

    Consider a two-span bridge as shown below.

    Picture1-4Two-span bridge
     
    Picture2-1Stage 1
     

     

    Picture3
    Stage 2

     

    The typical section is as shown.
    Picture4Typical section
     

     

    Section properties are:

     

     

    Area

    46.5119 ft2

    Moment of Inertia

    303.5361 ft4

    Perimeter (outside)

    74.0359 ft

    Perimeter (inside)

    35.1884 ft

    Material properties are:

    f'c

    6 ksi

    RH

    70%

                     Concrete

    Normal and rapid hardening

     

    Graph1

    Creep Coefficient

     

    Graph2

    Elastic Modulus (MPa)

     

    From the graph,

    φ(∞, 7) = 2.19                                   χ(∞, 7) = 0.74                                    φ(60, 7) = 0.975

    φ(∞, 60) = 1.46                                 χ(∞, 60) = 0.82.

     

    Ec(60)/Ec(7) = 1.040/0.882 = 1.179.

    At time t1 = 60 days, the member end forces due to self-weight at span 2 can be calculated as below. Note that Ec(60)/Ec(7) = 1.179. (MIDAS file ex.2C)

     

    Picture3-Jan-25-2022-02-32-29-52-AM

    [Member End Force] = [Stiffness]{Displacement} + {Fixed End Force}

    [Stiffness]{Displacement} = [Member End Force] - {Fixed End Force}

     

    Picture6

    Analyze two-span continuous beam for these member end loadings. Note that the section properties are as below and the loading directions may not be identical for each program. (MIDAS file ex.2D)

    Picture7

    Results (ft, kips)

    Picture6-3

    Finally, the member end forces are:


    Span AB

    Span BC

    Check this result with MIDAS output (MIDAS file ex.2E).

    Picture8

    Creep secondary moment (ft-kips)

     

    Construction analysis from MIDAS gives creep secondary moment at pier 2 as 6866 ft-kips. The error between the two methods is 6% and again we do not know where these differences come from. However, considering the uncertainty of creep itself, the author believes this error is acceptable in practical design.

     

    Download File [Click]

     

     

    About the Editor
    Seungwoo Lee PhD, P.E., S.E.
    Senior Supervising Engineer at WSP USAs (Tampa, FL)

    He is a Senior Supervising Engineer with a high level of expertise in the design and analysis of suspension bridges. He has a solid fundamental understanding of structures and can apply his knowledge exceptionally well to the design and analysis of highly complex structures. He is also a strong communicator, able to identify and distill the key information that is relevant to the task at hand and present it in a clear and quickly understandable manner.

    Subscribe to Newsletter

    Catch the weekly engineer news!

    What you may
    also like