Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil Español
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique Español
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • Sao Tome and Principe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain Español
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States of America English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English
Bridge

Mastering Unsymmetric Section Analysis in Bridge Design

Table of Contents Click the table of contents for details.

Unsymmetric Section Analysis

Assuming we are analyzing a bridge with the following section.

 

Fig 1Fig 1


It looks not easy even to calculate section properties. But midas software has a powerful function to calculate these section properties for us. Just select PSC-Value>Define by Coordinates, then midas Civil will do the rest, or at least most of them. The methodology to calculate section properties from coordinates requires repeated calculation. 

Looks perfect? Let's assume our bridge section is a much simpler one like the one below.

 

Fig 2Fig 2


We can feel something uncomfortable proceeding with the design with the section properties based on axis X and Y.

This is because axis X and Y are not the principal axes. In Fig 1 and Fig 2, midas Civil will calculate section properties for the X and Y axis and then interprets these Ix and Iy are for the principal axis, which is not true. This is a very common mistake and I have personally seen a girder failure due to these effects.

 

Fig 3Fig 3

 

We should let midas know X and Y are not principal axes and X & Y have rotated some angles from the principal axis X1 and Y1. In other words, we should let midas know the section properties for principal axis X1 and Y1, and how the member was rotated from the principal axis X1 and Y1. Some software has the capability to find the principal axis internally, but this is very exceptional.

 

Fig 4Fig 4

 

We must calculate section properties for principal axis X1, and Y1 (either from Fig 3 or Fig 4, but Fig 4 looks much easier for us, humans) and let midas know how the principal axis was rotated when we define members.

Let's go back to Fig 1.

 

Fig 5Fig 5

 

Axis X and Y are not principal axes because this section is not a symmetrical section. We must calculate section properties for the principal axis X1 and Y1, and then let midas know how it was rotated from the global axis. Without this information, there is no way that midas can identify what are the values for the principal axis and how the member was rotated.

It was easy in Fig 4 to calculate section properties for the principal axis X1 and Y1. But it looks not easy in Fig 5.

Why principal axis matter?

Assume we have a simple beam with Ix = 16.5. If apply vertical load P = 100 kips at the section CG, what would be the vertical deflection? Looks very simple problem.

 

vertical deflection

 

Is this correct?

 

Fig 6Fig 6

 

Assume a rectangular section as shown in Fig 6. If the force Ph and Pv are applied at the section CG, what are the deflections? Assume Pv = 86.7 kips and Ph = 50 kips.

 

deflections

 

If we draw the loads and deflections on the scale, it looks like Fig 7.

 

Fig 7Fig 7

 

The load and deflection directions are not matched. This makes sense because the moment of inertia for each axis is different and the deflection depends not only on the load magnitude but also on the moment of inertia.

 

Fig 8Fig 8

 

If we rotate Fig 7 to match the loading direction to the vertical axis, it will look like Fig 8. We can see that the deflection direction is not matched with the load direction. At first, this may look weird, but this is true and really what would happen in the unsymmetric sections.

If we give only Ix = 16.5 (correct value for x-axis) to midas, midas will interpret Ix as the moment of inertia for the principal axis and calculate vertical deflection only as 6.07 which is not true.

Even though limited software can do these calculations automatically, this is not usual, and we have to let midas know the moment of inertia for the principal axis and how the member is rotated. Otherwise, midas gives us wrong results.

 


Step 1

Calculate Ix, Iy, and Ixy for arbitrary selected axis XY.

 

Calculate Ix, Iy

 

Step 2

 

Calculate principal axis angle and moment of inertial for principal axis.

 

Calculation 3 Unsymmoment of inertial

 

Step 3

midas Civil can calculate section properties only for the horizontal and vertical axis. To let midas Civil calculate the moment of inertia for the principal axis, rotate the axis to match the principal axis with the horizontal and vertical axis. midas Civil will calculate the moment of inertia for the principal axis 1, and 2.

 

moment of inertia for the principal axis 1, and 2

 

Step 4

Rotate axis within midas Civil to represent the real structure orientation.

 

real structure orientation

Discussion

 

It looks very straightforward. However, we must calculate Ix, Iy, and Ixy in step 2. Unfortunately, midas Civil does not have the capability to calculate Ixy and we cannot use midas Civil section calculator at this step. The easiest way is to use CAD programs. Most CAD programs have the capability to calculate section properties for the given axis and for the principal axis. Otherwise, we can develop a simple excel to calculate Ixy.

These calculations look tricky, but this is the only way to model unsymmetric sections. Limited programs have the capability to perform these calculations internally, but this is exceptional.

 

#Unsymmetric Sections
#Principal Axis Calculation
#Structural Analysis Software

About the Editor
Seungwoo Lee PhD, P.E., S.E.
Senior Supervising Engineer WSP USAs (Tampa, FL)

He is a Senior Supervising Engineer with a high level of expertise in the design and analysis of suspension bridges. He has a solid fundamental understanding of structures and can apply his knowledge exceptionally well to the design and analysis of highly complex structures. He is also a strong communicator, able to identify and distill the key information that is relevant to the task at hand and present it in a clear and quickly understandable manner.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Catch the weekly engineer news!

What you may
also like