Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil Español
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique Español
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • Sao Tome and Principe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain Español
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States of America English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English
Bridge

Understanding Shear Behavior in Concrete with θ and β

Table of Contents Click the table of contents for details.

Findings and remarks

 

1. We can calculate the feasible crack angle ranges for each εx and vu/f’c combination. θ min corresponds to concrete crush and θ max corresponds to stirrup yielding.

 

crack angle ranges table

For εx=2/1000 condition, θ is 45° for stirrup yielding conditions, regardless of applied shear forces, because εt=2/1000.

 

calculation AASHTO LRFD 4

This table is well-matched with what Rahal and Collins have provided. For large vu/f’c conditions, the θ min and θ max are very close to each other and even no solution exists εx>1.5/1000 conditions. From past experiences, εx=1.0/1000 and vu/f’c=0.25 are considered practical limits. Above these limits, a section increase may be recommended.

 

Θ min is the absolute minimum because the section would crush if θ < θ min. However, θ max is a kind of economical limit because if θ > θ max, just the stirrup would not yield. In some cases, the optimum θ may be larger than θ max and engineering judgments would be required.

 

 

2. The following figures show θ (°) values from various sources.

 

values graphvalues tableεx=0/1000, Optimum crack angle θ(°)

 

For εx=0/1000 conditions, θ max limit controls. In other words, because the strain is small, nominal amounts of stirrups are required. For vu/f’c<0.1 ranges, θ from Collins and Mitchell, AASHTO LRFD 2nd ed., Rahal and Collins are higher than θ max. “In these cases, the shear that needs to be resisted is relatively low, while the parameters that increase the concrete contribution, Vc, such as prestressing or high axial compression are significant (i.e., low values of εx). For these designs, the amount of transverse reinforcement required will typically be less than the specified minimum amount for members with transverse reinforcement.” (Rahal and Collins)

 

Optimum crack angleεx=1/1000, Optimum crack angle θ(°)

 

For εx=1/1000 conditions, θs from various sources show some differences. However, all graphs show θ values are moved from θ max to θ min with the increase of vu/f’c.

 

 

3. Following figures show β (psi) values from various sources.

Optimum βεx=0/1000, Optimum β (psi)

 

For the εx=0/1000 condition, β from all sources are close except vu/f’c<0.1 ranges. In this range, the shear force itself is small and engineers are less interested in this region. Again, the shear behavior of this region is close to without reinforcement case and will not be discussed in this article.

 

shear force Optimum βεx=1/1000, Optimum β (psi)

 

For the εx=1/1000 condition, β from all sources are close, but there are some differences. For vu/f’c=0.175, Collins and Mitchell show β=1.40, however, AASHTO LRFD 3rd ed. shows β=1.96. AASHTO LRFD 2nd ed., Rahal and Collins, and authors' results show around β=1.75. It may be interesting to find out where these differences are from but considering the uncertainty of concrete itself and all the assumptions introduced, these differences may be acceptable.

 

 

4. The modified compression field theory is a very powerful tool to understand the shear behavior of concrete. We can estimate the crack angle for given section forces, assumed stirrups, and longitudinal reinforcements. Of course, there are many uncertainties and assumptions within the theory, and it may be argued that this kind of lengthy calculation may not be justified. However, the reasonable crack angle θ is very valuable for our design and our fore-engineers had to wait a long time just to find out how to calculate θ.

 

 

About the Editor
Seungwoo Lee, Ph.D., P.E., S.E.
Senior Supervising Engineer WSP USAs (Tampa, FL)

He is a Senior Supervising Engineer with a high level of expertise in the design and analysis of suspension bridges. He has a solid fundamental understanding of structures and can apply his knowledge exceptionally well to the design and analysis of highly complex structures. He is also a strong communicator, able to identify and distill the key information that is relevant to the task at hand and present it in a clear and quickly understandable manner.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Catch the weekly engineer news!

What you may
also like