Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil Español
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique Español
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • Sao Tome and Principe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain Español
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States of America English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English
Webinar
Ongoing Registration In Progress Closed

Bridge Masterclass Series:

From Structural Evaluation to Design Decisions

Engineering decision process explored

   
🗓️Session 1: May 28, 2026
🗓️Session 2: June 4, 2026
🕑 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (EDT)
Online (GotoWebinar)
✏️Overview

Reinforced or prestressed concrete, it's not just about cost. Every span you design carries real tradeoffs: cracking under service loads, camber control during staging, segment weights your contractor's crane can't handle. The choice between RC and PSC touches more of your project than the estimate sheet, and getting it wrong shows up in the field, not the office.

 

The answer involves a layered evaluation of structural performance, constructability, long-term durability, and project-specific constraints, and knowing the right approach and tools is what moves the decision forward with confidence.

 

This two-part series is built for exactly that. Structured as a live, flexible workshop, the series walks you through the complete engineering decision path  – from multi-stage structural evaluation to validated, defensible design decisions. Session 1 grounds you in a real case study. Session 2 equips you with the know-hows from the tools.

 

Attend both sessions (2 PDH total) and leave with a repeatable process for making the RC vs. PSC call and the modeling skills to back it up.

💻 Sessions

Session 1 - Case Study

Date: May 28, 2026 
Time: 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM (EDT)

Speaker:  Michael Williams, PE - Senior Structural Engineer /  Indianapolis Lead | Lawson-Fisher Associates

 

Session 1 will show how findings are translated into 3D refined models which in turn drove design decisions. He will share the multi-stage structural evaluation process, walking through how these models helped him decide which structure type to design and the advantages and disadvantages of the structure choice.

 


 

Session 2 - Learn & Apply

Date: June 4, 2026 
Time: 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM (EDT)

Speaker:  Anju Sunil - Structural Engineer / Senior Technical Team Associate | MIDAS

 

Session 2 will demonstrate the structural analysis using a 3D  FEM tool to apply the concepts and validate the results, building on the previous case study; this session shifts to a practical implementation. Using the modeling logic established in Session 1, a demonstration will show how 3D models are efficiently constructed to replicate the analysis.

📝Learning Objectives

The webinar series is designed to help attendees:
- Navigate the evaluation process engineers may use to select between RC and PSC structures types. 
- Critically assess the advantages and limitations of each structure type based on real projects constraints.
- Configure and validate model inputs, section properties, supports, and loads for a multi-span slab bridge in 3D FEM.
- Leverage finite element analysis results to move from evaluation to a defensible design decision.

🎙️Speakers

anju new
Michael Williams
Senior Structural Engineer | Lawson-Fisher Associates
Mike earned his B.S and M.S. from the State University of New York at Buffalo and has 20 years of experience in the design, fabrication, and inspection of bridges. Mike is FHWA-NHI-certified Team Leader for bridge inspection. His experience includes finite element modeling and design of various bridges ranging from slab bridges to cable-stayed bridges, temporary shoring and retaining structures, airport bridges, permanent retaining walls, soil-structure interaction, and load rating and an occasional building from time to time. He currently serves as a senior bridge/structural engineer and Indianapolis Lead for Lawson-Fisher and Associates.
1-May-12-2026-06-15-25-4357-PM
Anju Sunil
Senior Technical Team Associate | MIDAS
Anju is a Senior Technical Engineer at MIDAS IT, with 7+ years of bridge design experience. She holds a Master’s degree in Structural Engineering from IIT Bombay and a Bachelor’s in Civil Engineering from NIT Calicut. She contributed to major infrastructure projects across India, Australia, New Zealand & the US, where she worked on the detailed design of various bridges such as box girder bridges, PSC composite bridges, and steel truss bridges. She provides real-time technical guidance and shares her expertise with users across the globe.