Fill out the form to keep watching
Having trouble viewing the video?
Some regions or networks may restrict Vimeo playback.
Your submission has been
successfully received
If you meet the certification criteria,
Your Certificate of Completion will be sent to your email.
If you need urgent support, contact us via
here.
We truly appreciate your participation!
Open Access Has Ended
The open access period has ended.
If you have a MIDAS account, sign in
and complete the access form to watch this session.
Full access is one step away 👀
Complete a short form to continue
Benefit
→ Will receive email by submitting survey
Description
- This video explores practical design decisions in Composite Steel Reinforced Concrete structures that are not fully handled by structural analysis software alone.
- The session uses a real six storey building project in West Java, Indonesia, designed as an SRC composite moment frame with ASCE 7, ACI 318, and AISC 360 references.
- Key topics include why SRC was selected, how MIDAS Gen and DESIGN+ are used together, and how engineers can manage the design workflow across different code bases.
- The session compares RC and SRC column modelling approaches to show when an RC model can be used as an efficient and slightly conservative proxy before final SRC verification.
- Recommended for engineers who want to understand how software results should be interpreted, checked, and converted into sound engineering decisions.
Key Points
SRC System Selection for Composite Building Design
MIDAS Gen and DESIGN+ Integrated Design Workflow
RC Model as a Proxy for SRC Column Sizing
RC and SRC Model Comparison for Dynamic Behaviour
DCR Comparison and Final SRC Verification
Engineering Judgment Beyond Software Output
Speaker