Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English
On-Demand
🌐
Back to the list
Global FEM Online Workshop Series 2025 Session 2. Ensuring Earthfill Dam Safety in Seismic Zones – A Real Case from Turkey August 27, 2025 - 03:00 & 08:00 GMT (50min)

Seismic safety of earthfill dams has become a critical concern, particularly in seismically active regions. Among the key factors influencing dam performance during earthquake loading is crest settlement, which can result in overtopping and potential failure. Therefore, accurately predicting and evaluating settlement behavior is essential for both design optimization and risk mitigation.

This session features a real-world case study by DOLSAR Engineering, demonstrating how dynamic analysis using GTS NX can be applied to simulate earthquake-induced deformation in earthfill dams. Participants will gain hands-on insights into time-history analysis, seismic input modeling, and interpretation of numerical results to support both new dam designs and retrofit strategies.

Join us to explore a practical end-to-end workflow for seismic analysis of embankment dams — from site conditions to advanced numerical modeling — and see how GTS NX can enhance accuracy, efficiency, and decision-making in geotechnical design.

 

✳️ Who Should Attend

  • Civil and geotechnical engineers interested in finite element modeling

  • Dam designers who calibrate their designs based on analysis results

  • Students and junior engineers who want to learn how to model earthfill dams

 

✳️ Why Should Join 

  • Learn how to build a dynamic analysis of earthfill dams using GTS NX

  • Understand the workflow from site data to seismic input and numerical modeling

  • Explore material models used in earthfill dam analysis

  • Discover key considerations in predicting crest settlement during earthquakes

  • Get your questions answered directly by the speaker

 

✳️ What You'll Take Away

  • Practical tips on using efficient and fast FEM tools in GTS NX

  • Better ways to model the dynamic effect of reservoir water on upstream slopes

  • Insights on how to easily analyze post-earthquake slope stability

 

✳️ Related MIDAS Software

 

🚩 Check the Q&A highlights below for the speaker’s answers from the live session.

Oguz Salih OkcuGeotechnical Engineer, DOLSAR Engineering Inc. Co.

Oguz Salih Okcu is a geotechnical engineer in Dolsar Engineering, Turkiye. He's holding a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering and a Master of Science in Geotechnical Engineering, focusing on geotechnical earthuqake engineering. He uses GTS NX in his projects extensively for two years, mainly on dam bodies and hydraulic tunnels in dam projects.

Q&A Highlights

Tech Q1. What are the minimum requirements for a soil constitutive model for this analysis?

A. It actually depends on your analysis type and soil type. If you are loading-reloading soil, it's better to use a model to account that effect. Because elastic modulus should change with the normal pressure. Additionally in dynamic analyses, variation of shear strain is important and you can account the change in shear modulus with small strain stiffness model. If you don't have loading-reloading or dynamic load, you can just go on with Mohr-Coulomb. But apart from all of that, if your analysis type changes, you should use a model according to that (eg. PM4Sand in liquefaction analyses).

Tech Q2. Which major factors are considered when determining spectral acceleration values?

A. The first thing is, you have to base your record selection on a seismic hazard analysis and a resultant response spectra. Later on, with the geology that you've been provided, you can limit your records with Vs30 values, distance between site and fault and faulting type. Record selection is completely another topic of expertise. But generally choosing a close response spectra to the given hazard analysis response spectra works fine.

Tech Q3. In dynamic analysis, is pore pressure treated as a preset value based on the initial water level?

A. I define the pore pressure before the dynamic step and it stays constant in dynamic analysis. If you want to see the change in the porewater pressures within the dynamic analysis, you should perform "coupled" analysis.

Tech Q4. How is pore air pressure accounted for during or immediately after construction stability checks?

A. As far as I know, pore pressures (air + water) acts together in the software. You can account them with definition of porous material properties in material settings.

Tech Q5. If there are horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration components, are they applied over the same time period?

A. In GTS NX you can input horizontal and vertical components together as they act together in the nature. Failure modes of the dam are calculated in the eigenvalue analysis and they do not change according to orientation of dynamic load components.

Tech Q6. Can the “dead section” of the dam be neglected in this type of analysis?

A. If you mean appurtenant structures (eg. spillway) by "the dead section", yes we neglect these structures in dam body analyses.

Tech Q7. How can an ice lens on the reservoir surface be included?

A. In the regions that I work, ice loads are not accounted but in the manuals and guidelines there's no mention about the ice loads. Thus, there's no need to define it. However, maybe you can use sloshing medium material with the definition of bulk modulus of ice.

Tech Q8. Do we need to explicitly mesh the Groundwater Level (GWL) in the soil?

A. Actually you don't have to but I prefer to mesh again after defining the phreatic line. So that your meshes look better below and above the phreatic line.

Tech Q9. Construction stage analysis often becomes unstable or hard to converge. Any practical tips?

A. "If your model is somehow complex, estimating the inital stress of activated elements really helps to find a solution but always check your deformation results to stay in a realistic range. Another thing to put attention is ""Estimate initial configuration of activated nodes"" in embankment dams. This have to be unchecked in embankment dam construction stages, otherwise you'll have unrealistic deformation shape."

Tech Q10. How should dam–foundation base shear be modeled and interlayer drifts be checked?

A. Since I'm modeling an embankment dam (for this instance) I don't check the base shear between my foundation and the dam. But to check it in concrete dams, you should define an interface mesh set.

General Q1. Is this training program free of charge?

A. Yes! The Global Geotechnical Webinar Series 2025 is completely free of charge. Once registered, you’ll get access to all live and on-demand sessions, expert talks, hands-on tasks, and learning materials — at no cost.

General Q2. How do I get the training license?

A. Trial licenses for GTS NX and FEA NX are provided only to registered participants. You can find free trial information in the register confirmation email. If you can't find in your inbox, please contact us via the below link : 🔗 Click

General Q3. Where can I get the assignment files and how should I submit them?

A. There is no assignment for the session 2.

General Q4. How can I ask a question to MIDAS experts?

A. Please submit your question using the form below. One of our technical experts/regional manager will get back to you shortly.🔗 Submit Your Inquiry(Assignment/Technical)🔗 Submit Your Inquiry (Product/Purchase)

General Q5. How can I receive the certificate of completion?

A. To be eligible for the certificate, please make sure to:
✅ Attend at least 2 live sessions
✅ Submit 2 or more assignments by October 8
Certificates will be emailed to qualified participants on October 15, 2025.

Copied the link