Fill out the form to keep watching
Having trouble viewing the video?
Some regions or networks may restrict Vimeo playback.
Modelling underground structures like the MC103 underpass means connection assumptions have to match actual construction sequencing — not idealised fixed supports.
- Pile springs and compression-only springs for the SBP wall and surrounding soil
- Beam end releases at the base slab-to-SBP connection, driven by drill-in bar constraints
- Load combinations under LTA CDC Chapter 8, imported via the MCT Command Shell
- A plate model for vehicle collision loading on the underpass walls
A strong fit when validating beam end release assumptions before advancing load combinations under LTA CDC.
Your submission has been
successfully received
If you meet the certification criteria,
Your Certificate of Completion will be sent to your email.
If you need urgent support, contact us via
here.
We truly appreciate your participation!
Open Access Has Ended
The open access period has ended.
If you have a MIDAS account, sign in
and complete the access form to watch this session.
Full access is one step away 👀
Complete a short form to continue
Description
Project DE151 upgrades the road network between Upper Changi Flyover and Tanah Merah Flyover in Singapore, to support future traffic from Changi Terminal 5 and surrounding developments. The case study in this session focuses on the MC103 underpass, which crosses beneath the East Coast Parkway (ECP), the main route in and out of Changi Airport. The underpass sits within a 620m depressed road section, with the underpass itself spanning approximately 90m. The design combines bottom-up construction for the depressed road with top-down construction for the underpass, retained by Secant Bored Pile (SBP) walls that serve as both temporary and permanent structures.
Using MIDAS CIVIL NX, a typical underpass cross-section is modelled as a 2D frame — a one-metre strip — with the SBP wall represented as pile springs and the surrounding soil as compression-only springs. Beam end releases are applied at the base slab-to-SBP wall connection to reflect the pinned condition arising from the site's dowel-bar detailing, since full moment continuity cannot be achieved at that interface. Load combinations follow the LTA Civil Design Criteria (LTACDC) and are imported directly between models using the MCT command shell, rather than being recreated manually for each project. For vehicle collision loading on the underpass walls, a plate model is used instead of the frame model, to capture two-dimensional load distribution and local stress concentration around the impact location. Results — including axial force, bending moment, shear force, and spring reactions — are extracted at planned node locations and compiled into a Word-based design report using the Dynamic Report Generator.
Benefit
will be emailed after 2nd survey submission
Key Points
Modelling the MC103 underpass (Project DE151) as a 2D frame representing the SBP wall as pile springs and the surrounding soil as compression-only springs
Applying beam end releases to reflect the pinned base slab-to-SBP wall connection based on site dowel-bar detailing
Setting up load combinations under the LTA Civil Design Criteria (LTACDC) and importing them between models using the MCT command shell
Switching to a plate model to assess vehicle collision loading and local stress concentration on the underpass walls
Extracting axial force, bending moment, shear force, and spring reactions at planned node locations
Compiling analysis results into a design report using the Dynamic Report Generator
Speaker