Fill out the form to keep watching
Having trouble viewing the video?
Some regions or networks may restrict Vimeo playback.
Same anchor block, two methods: MIDAS FEA NX reads 72 MPa where AASHTO gives 241 MPa.
In the session
- AASHTO bursting, local zone and spalling checks by hand
- 3D cracked model with embedded rebar in MIDAS FEA NX
- Rebar stress, crack pattern and crack width compared
- Where the FEA and AASHTO results agree and differ
Stronger outcomes in MIDAS FEA NX workflows begin with improving bursting reinforcement through a 3D cracked model.
Your submission has been
successfully received
If you meet the certification criteria,
Your Certificate of Completion will be sent to your email.
If you need urgent support, contact us via
here.
We truly appreciate your participation!
Open Access Has Ended
The open access period has ended.
If you have a MIDAS account, sign in
and complete the access form to watch this session.
Full access is one step away 👀
Complete a short form to continue
Description
| In this session | |
| 00:00 ~ 02:58 | Introduction and case study: 35 m PCI girder |
| 02:58 ~ 07:17 | AASHTO hand calculation of the bursting force |
| 07:17 ~ 15:46 | 3D cracked model in MIDAS FEA NX: modeling, loading and analysis |
| 15:46 ~ 26:46 | Bursting rebar stress, local zone and spiral reinforcement: FEA vs AASHTO |
| 26:46 ~ | Spalling, edge tension and crack width against the BS 5400 limit |
| Vietnamese versionThis session is also available in Vietnamese. | Watch in Vietnamese → |
The AASHTO specifications give an approximate method for anchorage zone design, which takes the bursting force as roughly 25% of the jacking force — a result that aligns with a strut-and-tie model at a strut angle of about 30 degrees. This session applies that method to the anchor block of a 35 m PCI girder with four 17-strand tendons, a 1.2 load factor on the jacking force and a tendon inclination of 4.15 degrees, arriving at a dense layout of horizontal and vertical bursting reinforcement. AASHTO itself notes that the method is conservative, that the actual bursting force concentrates closer to the anchor plate, and that 3D effects should be investigated.
The same anchor block is then modeled in MIDAS FEA NX as a 3D cracked model: solid elements for the concrete, embedded rebar for the bursting, spalling, edge tension and spiral reinforcement, nonlinear stress-strain curves for both materials, and the jacking force applied as a uniform pressure of 40 MPa on the anchor plates. When the tensile stress in the concrete exceeds its capacity, cracking occurs and internal forces are redistributed to the reinforcement, so rebar stresses and crack widths are read directly from the model.
In the FEA model, the horizontal bursting rebar stress is 72 MPa against 241 MPa by the AASHTO method, and the vertical bursting rebar carries only about 25 MPa because the vertical bursting force spreads through a larger volume of concrete. The session attributes the gap to the strut-and-tie assumption of a freely elongating tie, where the 3D model keeps the bar bonded and restrained, and to part of the force being shared by the vertical reinforcement. The local zone compressive stress, by contrast, matches the AASHTO value of 18.32 MPa closely. Cracks remain only partially open, with widths within 27 microns against the BS 5400 limit of 0.1 mm, and the crack pattern is read against the AASHTO bursting rebar length for the governing horizontal direction.
Key Points
Modeling a three-span, two-track balanced cantilever viaduct with pile springs
Building the intended erection and stitching order as construction stages
Checking segment out of balance when only one lifter runs
Representing accidental segment drop as an upward concentrated load
Comparing stitching and stressing orders through tendon secondary moments
Reading pier and pile foundation design forces per construction stage
Speaker
Senior Bridge and Structural Engineer with 18 years of comprehensive experience leading the design, analysis, and delivery of complex highway and railway infrastructure across Asia and Africa. Proven track record of managing large-scale ODA-funded projects, specialising in extradosed, cable-stayed, and continuous concrete/steel box-girder bridges alongside ancillary highway structures (such as retaining walls, box/pipe culverts, and ITS gantries). Adept at performing advanced finite element analysis (FEA), mitigating construction risks, and ensuring strict compliance with international engineering codes, including BS5400, AASHTO, Eurocodes, Japanese Standards, and Indian Standards.