Fill out the form to keep watching
Having trouble viewing the video?
Some regions or networks may restrict Vimeo playback.
A 255% vertical irregularity was not a modeling error to fix — it was the building.
In the session
- Beam end releases, rigid diaphragm, fixed base assumptions
- Response spectrum analysis required by NSCP 2015 irregularity provisions
- 98% modal participating mass, coupled translation-rotation modes
- Torsional irregularity found in maximum-to-average drift, not drift ratio
A strong fit when validating diaphragm and support assumptions in MIDAS Gen before advancing to response spectrum analysis.
Your submission has been
successfully received
If you meet the certification criteria,
Your Certificate of Completion will be sent to your email.
If you need urgent support, contact us via
here.
We truly appreciate your participation!
Open Access Has Ended
The open access period has ended.
If you have a MIDAS account, sign in
and complete the access form to watch this session.
Full access is one step away 👀
Complete a short form to continue
Description
Site and regulatory constraints shaped this reinforced concrete building in the Philippines before any analysis began. A sloping lot cut off from the road by a creek required a single-span access bridge, aviation height limits under the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) capped the structure at three above-ground stories, two basement levels, and a roof deck, and the resulting step-back left the basements exposed on three sides.
The three-dimensional model was built in MIDAS Gen under the National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 2015 and ACI 318M-14, with beam end releases where secondary beams were not intended to transfer moment into the supporting girders, a rigid diaphragm assumption based on the continuity of the reinforced concrete floor system, and fixed supports at the column bases. The step-back triggered a vertical geometric irregularity check, which returned 255% against a 130% limit — a value treated as a correct description of an irregular building rather than a modeling error to be removed.
Response spectrum analysis was selected because NSCP 2015 requires a dynamic lateral force procedure for vertically irregular structures, and because the exposed basements participate in the lateral response rather than behaving as buried levels. Modal participating mass reached 98%, and the mode shapes showed translation coupled with up to 47.8% rotation, indicating an offset between the center of mass and the center of rigidity. Story drift ratios passed the 0.025 limit, but the maximum-to-average drift ratio exceeded the 1.2 limit — a torsional irregularity the drift ratio check alone does not reveal. The increased torsional demand was carried into the design of the critical columns under NSCP 2015 and UBC 1997 accidental torsion provisions.
Key Points
Modeling a stepped-back reinforced concrete building in MIDAS Gen under NSCP 2015
Applying beam end releases, rigid diaphragm, and fixed base assumptions
Checking vertical geometric irregularity against the NSCP 2015 130% limit
Selecting response spectrum analysis for a vertically irregular structure
Reading modal participating mass and coupled translation-rotation mode shapes
Detecting torsional irregularity from maximum-to-average story drift ratios
Speaker