Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil Español
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique Español
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • Sao Tome and Principe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain Español
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States of America English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English
Webinar
Ongoing Registration In Progress Closed
Seismic Design of Bridges under Spatially Variable Ground Motion:
New Eurocode 8 Part 2 Provisions and Practical Design Implications
    📍Online (GotoWebinar)
🕑 Slot 1 - 12:00PM (MYT,SGT) | 13:30PM (ACT)
🕑Slot 2 - 12:00AM (CEST) | 11:00AM (BST) | 17:00PM (ICT)
💻Duration: 60min - 90min
Session Overview

Spatially variable ground motion (SVGM), the difference in seismic excitation across a bridge's supports, can go unaccounted for in conventional analysis, understating demand on long or multi span bridges by 30 percent or more.

 

The updated Eurocode 8 Part 2 introduces clear criteria for when this must be addressed, and a simplified method to account for it without a full spatial ground motion analysis. Prof. Anastasios Sextos, who sits on the Eurocode drafting committee behind these provisions, walks through the new decision framework, the simplified method, and validation against real instrumented bridges.

 

Learn when the new EN1998–2 provisions require spatial variability analysis in bridge design, and how to apply them without a full simulation.


Save My Spot Now
Who Should Attend
  •  Structural and bridge engineers designing under Eurocode 8, especially those working on long span, multi span, or geologically complex projects across Europe. 

  •  Engineers early in their career who want to build expertise on the updated EN1998 provisions before they become standard practice on live projects. 

  •  Senior engineers and technical leads who need to assess how the code change affects current project workflows, tools, and compliance timelines. 
 

Learning Objectives

📌When Does EN1998–2 Require Spatial Variability Analysis? 

Use the updated decision criteria to determine whether your current or upcoming project requires SVGM analysis. 

 

📌How Does the New Method Change Your Design Workflow? 

Understand how the updated provisions affect analysis scope and effort, including cases where a simplified approach can be applied efficiently. 

 

📌What Does Real Bridge Data Say About Spatial Variability? 

See how the new provisions hold up against recorded data from instrumented bridges under actual seismic events with the Evripos bridge in Greece etc.

Good to Know

What is spatially variable ground motion in bridge design?
- It is the difference in seismic excitation experienced across a bridge's supports, and a key factor in seismic risk for long or multi span bridges.

 

When does Eurocode 8 require SVGM analysis?
- The updated EN1998–2 introduces clear criteria based on bridge length and soil conditions for when this must be addressed.

Speaker
Group 72
Anastasios Sextos
Professor of Earthquake Engineering, University of Bristol, UK | National Technical University of Athens, Greece

He serves on the drafting committee of the Structural Eurocodes, the same body behind the EN1998–2 provisions covered in this session, and has authored more than 110 journal papers on earthquake engineering and bridge seismic design. His research includes a GCRF funded project in Nepal that delivered the world's first building on a low cost PVC based seismic isolation system.