Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

Finalizing the Forces in the Cables for a Cable-Stayed Bridge

September 23, 2021
BLOG BRIDGE INSIGHT

Please fill out the Download Section (Click here) below the Comment Section to download the The Complete Guide to Temperature Gradient


 

 

Finalizing the Forces in the Cables for a Cable-Stayed Bridge

 

 

Table of Contents

 

1. Introduction

2. Unknown Load Factor Method in midas Civil

3. Main Factors to be Considered for Cable Optimization


 

1. Introduction

 

A cable-stayed bridge is the most popular long-span bridge in which cables support the bridge deck and transfer the load to one or more towers(or pylons). Mostly the cables form a fan-like pattern or series of parallel lines. The main span of cable-stayed bridges, which consists of two towers, ranges from 100m to 1100m. Analysis of cable-stayed bridge involves two main stages:

 

1.1 Final Stage Analysis

 

Starting Point of a cable-stayed bridge is an idealized stressed state at a given time for permanent loads, and this is called the final stage. Initial cable forces are determined for this final stage. Further static and dynamic analyses are undertaken using the final stage.

 

1.2 Construction Stage Analysis

 

Construction stage analysis of a cable-stayed bridge can be in backward sequence or forward sequence. As the determination of the initial cable forces of the final structure does not consider the actual construction process, a detailed construction stage analysis is needed to determine the forces in the cables at each construction stage. Further, we check stresses in the girder, pylon, and cables at each construction stage such that cable forces of each stage are finalized.

 

 


 

2. Unknown Load Factor Method to Optimize Cable Pretensions

 

In the design of cable-stayed bridges, we often face a problem where we would seek a solution to cable forces necessary to satisfy a given design requirement. Midas Civil can solve this type of problem using an optimization technique by calculating the optimum variables for given constraints and object functions. For constraint conditions, equality and inequality conditions are permitted.

By using the optimization technique, a solution satisfying the equality/inequality conditions is obtained. Numerous solutions to the unknown loads exist depending on the constraints imposed on the Equality/Inequality conditions. Midas Civil finds a solution to Equality/inequality conditions, which uses variables that minimize the given object functions. Midas Civil allows us to select the sum of the absolute values, the sum of the squares, and the maximum absolute values of variables for the object functions. Weight factors can be assigned to specific variables to control their relative importance, and the effective ranges of the variables can be specified.

A comprehensive understanding of a cable structure is required to use the above optimization technique for finding necessary design variables. Since Equality or Inequality conditions may not have a solution depending on the constraints, selecting appropriate design conditions and object functions is very important.

 

Unknown Load Factor Method can be used for:

The procedure of calculating the initial prestress for the cable-stayed bridge by the unknown factor method is outlined in Figure 1.

 

Image1

Figure 1. Flowchart for initial cable pretension calculation
 
 
 

 

Cable stayed bridges are generally considered to be a reliable and safe type of bridge structure. However, in rare cases, cable stayed bridge collapse can occur due to various factors such as design flaws, construction defects, and natural disasters. One notable example is the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State in 1940, which was caused by aeroelastic flutter due to high winds.

To ensure the safety and reliability of cable stayed bridges, engineers use various analysis techniques to assess their structural integrity. One such technique is the static analysis of cable-stayed bridges, which involves determining the forces acting on the bridge structure and analyzing its response to static loads.

 

Another important aspect of cable stayed bridge analysis is the transverse analysis of PSC box girder bridges or box girder bridges. This involves analyzing the bridge's resistance to lateral forces, such as wind or earthquakes, which can cause the bridge to sway or vibrate.

 

One example of a cable-stayed bridge that has undergone extensive analysis is the Octavio Frias de Oliveira Bridge in São Paulo, Brazil. This cable-stayed bridge spans the Pinheiros River and has a unique curved design. Engineers used static and transverse analysis techniques to ensure the bridge's stability and safety.

 
 
 

 

3. Main Factors to be Considered for Cable Optimization

 

 

3.1 Creep and Shrinkage Properties

3.2 Multiple Tensioning of Cables

3.3 Large Displacement Effect

3.4 Constraints to be Given Based on Real Displacements 



3.1 Creep and Shrinkage Properties

Creep and shrinkage effects will be significant in long-span bridges like cable-stayed bridges. Optimized pretension without considering the erection sequence can be obtained using an unknown load factor method and further these pretensions shall be used for creep and shrinkage.

 

3.2 Multiple Tensioning of Cables

As Unknown Load Factor does not support multiple tensioning in finding the cable forces, we have to assign the first tensioning as “Unknown” and then optimize the cable forces.

 

3.3 Large Displacement Effect

Large displacement effects can be significant, and there can be convergence issues if the large displacement effect and creep&shrinkage effects are considered simultaneously in the first run of the unknown load factor method. Hence it is recommended to optimize the cable pretension first by considering creep and shrinkage only. Then in the next step, a large displacement effect (Non-linear construction stage analysis) can be considered with these pretensions.

 

3.4 Constraints to be Given Based on Real Displacements

If the real displacement of the deck needs to be considered in the unknown load factor method, then we can create a dummy deck element line along the main span, which will share the common node with actual deck elements. These dummy deck elements shall be activated before the actual main deck elements are activated in the beginning stage. This approach will consider the tangent displacement of the deck.

 

 

Susbcribe
MIDAS Newsletter

Thank you, See you soon!
Share
About the Author
Suman Dhara | Senior Bridge Engineer | MIDAS IT India

Suman has pursued his Master's Degree in Structural Engineering from IIT Hyderabad and has 6+ years of extensive Technical Consulting experience for Bridge & Building Projects. He enjoys providing solutions to engineers on sophisticated projects ranging from bridge engineering, building engineering, and special mechanics problems. 

Comments
DOWNLOAD Ebook Download

Please fill out the form below
to download the Ebook

All