Would you like to sign out?
On-Demand
🌐
Back to the list
Global FEM Online Workshop Series 2025 Session 4. Modeling of Continuous Helix Piles September 10, 2025 - 03:00 & 08:00 GMT (30min)

This session demonstrates the modeling and analysis of continuous helix screw piles in GTS NX, validated with real-world data from full-scale field tests. You’ll see how to overcome one of the most challenging aspects in FEM software — meshing a full 3D helix — and how GTS NX allows you to achieve this without oversimplifying the geometry into basic plates. From geometry creation to mesh refinement and result extraction, this session covers the complete workflow for accurate, efficient deep foundation analysis.

 

✳️ Who Should Attend

  • Geotechnical engineers interested in deep foundation analysis and design

 

✳️ Why Should Join 

  • Building mesh for complex geometry
  • Using the auto connect tool to ensure the integrity of the different mesh sets
  • Using mesh control to refine the mesh in important narrow parts to avoid concentration of stresses.
  • How to decrease the size of your file by avoiding unnecessary results recording.
  • How to decrease the amount of analysis time without hurting accuracy too much.
  • After analysis, extract section forces using the LDF tool

 

✳️ What You'll Take Away

  • Mesh control, control over the type of desired results required, reduce analysis time

 

✳️ Related MIDAS Software

 

🚩 Check the Q&A highlights below for the speaker’s answers from the live session.

Ahmed MneinaPhD candidate, P.Eng, Western University

Ahmed Mneina is a licensed Professional Engineer in Ontario, holding a Master’s degree in Geotechnical Engineering from Western University. Since 2018, Ahmed has worked on various infrastructure projects, including two major wind turbine projects in Ontario Canada. Currently, he is a PhD candidate at Western University, where his research focuses on the testing and numerical modeling of helical piles and grouted helical piles. His research work was recognised by several awards including WORLDiscoveries Annual Vanguard Award 2018.

Q&A Highlights

Tech Q1. Have you also compared using a cylinder over the length of the portion of the pile with a helix (for instance if the pile has two 300mm diameter helixes spaced 900mm apart, simply modelled as a 300mm diameter cylinder 900mm long? The soil between the helix is confined, so it acts similar to a cylinder. It would need to be compared to the pile load tests to confirm it is appropriate.

A. I see exactly what you mean. In theory, we can assume either cylindrical shear mode (CSM) or individual bearing mode (IBM). Here, you are assuming a fully cylindrical shear mode. There are two main points I should point out in your question before answering: 1- The assumption that only cylindrical shear governs the failure (which is assuming that the helical zone is a perfect cylinder) and no IBM will occure is not accurate; becase we do not know for sure which mode can occur until we test the model itself with regular helices or through very detailed instrumented field testing. In my case, both modes occurred at different stages of the loading, so we cant assume cylindrical mode form the start. 2- The second important point is that the cylinder that is forming in reality could be considered as a composite section of soil and steel, since it is formed by wrapping soil around the pile (that is what happens in the real soil). Then the new section should take the composite properties and they should be calculated it accurately to represent the soil-steel section. This could be a simplification for simpler modeling (i.e Tz-Qz method) for modeling piles, but not in finite element, where we can actually model soil and steel as soil and steel. So to answer your question, I did not try to model a steel-soil cylinder in FEM for this particular pile; however, I did that using another approach simpler than FEM using Tz-Qz curves taken from strain gage data analysis, the best refernce for Tz-Qz approach is Fellenius' Red book "Basics of Foundation Design" chapter 8 it is available for free online.

Tech Q2. Why manual interface input is preferred by presenter over interface wizard, doesn't it automatically changes stiffness of interface according to soil layers?

A. Yes, it does when you start the wizard and create an interface for one soil layer. but if you start changing the soil properties to fine-tune your model, or if you want to change the reduction factor of the interface (R) the interface properties will not be automatically updated, you have to either: Update them manually (using the equations) OR use the wizard which mean you have to >> delete the interface and merge the nodes (interface creation will split nodes shared by pile and soil mesh and you have to merge them if you want to delete the interface) and create a new interface using the wizard to update the properties. This is a very long process, and the easiest is just to update the properties manually. The second reason, I found it more efficient to use the manual update of properties, is that I have multiple soil layers, and to create the interface using the wizard I can only select the pile and create only one interface using the wizard which will take the properties of the top soil layer and ignore the other layers (that was what I noticed). I have to split the interface mesh to match the soil layer, and I ended up adjusting the other properties manually.

Tech Q3. How is the advanced rate modeled?

A. I understand that you men advancement rate during installation. Unfortinatlly FEM does not model installation process. It can only handle the digridation of soil due to installation process. you need a more advanced approach to model installaiton effects.

Tech Q4. Is the difference large when we model a simplified model of the pile instead of modelling a 3D screwed pile?

A. For a single helix, there is no big difference, but if you are modeling multiple helcies I recommend modeling a full helix. Because if your helices are closer than 3D they might interfere with each oterh and the pitch will play a big role in that interferance.

Tech Q5. What is the allowable displacement and safety factor in tension?

A. The allawable displacenemt and safty factor are not generial for all piles and they are case specific, depending mainly on the superstrucre carried by the piles. For example, Generally the displacement should not be more than 25mm, and safty factor of 1.5 is acceptable. Some designers will not allow more than 10% of helix diameter multiplied by a factor of safty to insure the pile stays in the elastic zone.

Tech Q6. Is there any specifications or code for the distance between two helical plates? and also the size of helix?

A. There is no code spicifieng exaclty how far the helices should be or how big they should be; however, it is common in practice to space them 3 times the helix diameter to avoid helical interaction and increase eficincy. There are acceptance criteria published by the International Code Council (https://helicalpileworld.com/ac358%20-%20revised%20June%202012.pdf), it talks about the necessary procedure to accept the helical pile based on performance.

Tech Q7. Is this considered displacement or non-displacement pile?

A. They are considered displacement piles; however, the amount of soil displaced is not significant, and their capacity is not based on the increase of lateral stresses caused by soil displacement. Their capacity is based on the bearing resistance of the helical plate and/or the cylindrical shear plane formed between the helical plates and the soil (two main theories related to helical pile capacity: CSM and IBM). Therefore, we don’t usually model the lateral displacement of the soil; the soil lateral displacement (if there is a significant lateral displacement) is modeled using the cavity expansion inside FEM software, which is the approach for displacement piles.

Tech Q8. It's about the 'Interface' feature. When I click on it, I see three options: Line, Shell, and Plane. Which of these is applicable in this particular case?

A. In modeling a pile using a volume element, use the Plane interface, which is the case I presented. If you model a pile using a beam element, use line interface; if you model using a shell element ( I dont think engineers use shell element for piles, but maybe) use shell interface.

General Q1. Is this training program free of charge?

A. Yes! The Global Geotechnical Webinar Series 2025 is completely free of charge. Once registered, you’ll get access to all live and on-demand sessions, expert talks, hands-on tasks, and learning materials — at no cost.

General Q2. How do I get the training license?

A. Trial licenses for GTS NX and FEA NX are provided only to registered participants. You can find free trial information in the register confirmation email. If you can't find in your inbox, please contact us via the below link : 🔗 Click

General Q3. Where can I get the assignment files and how should I submit them?

A. You can download the assignment files from the button at the top of the page labeled [Assignment (Model & Tutorial)], and they will also be sent via email after the webinar ends.Once completed, please submit your assignments through the form link below.🔗 Assignment Submission Form.

General Q4. How can I ask a question to MIDAS experts?

A. Please submit your question using the form below. One of our technical experts/regional manager will get back to you shortly.🔗 Submit Your Inquiry(Assignment/Technical)🔗 Submit Your Inquiry (Product/Purchase)

General Q5. How can I receive the certificate of completion?

A. To be eligible for the certificate, please make sure to:
✅ Attend at least 2 live sessions
✅ Submit 2 or more assignments by October 8
Certificates will be emailed to qualified participants on October 15, 2025.

Copied the link