Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

Design Considerations for Arch Bridges

May 19, 2021
BLOG BRIDGE INSIGHT

The Whole New MIDAS Site Banner

 

🗂️ Download Now

Please fill out the Download Section below the Comment Section to download the 80 Masterworks of CIVIL Engineering

Buttons_Download Now

 

1. Arch Bridge Definition and Classifications

 

An arch bridge is usually defined as a vertically curved and axially compressed structural member spanning an opening and providing support for the moving loads above the opening. The deck can be supported or hung from this main structure, and depending on the position of the arch relative to the deck, arch bridges can be classified as deck arch, through arch, and half-through arch bridges as shown below:

 

Deck Arch BridgeFigure 1. Deck Arch Bridge
 
Through Arch BridgeFigure 2. Through Arch Bridge
 
Half-Through Arch BridgeFigure 3. Half-Through Arch Bridge

 

2. Design Considerations for Arch Bridges

 

Many factors affect the design of an arch bridge. In general, these factors are related to function, cost, safety, aesthetics, traffic demand capacity, foundation conditions, erection procedure, clearance requirements, and so on. General design recommendations focus mainly on the arch-to-span ratio, the arch and deck slenderness, and the number of hangers or piers.

 

a. Rise-to-Span Ratio

 

The rise-to-span ratio for arches may vary widely because an arch can be very shallow or, at the other extreme, could be a half-circle. Most arches would have rise-to-span ratios within the range of 1:4.5 to 1:6.

There are typical spans used for different types of materials. Below are some:

 

  • Filled spandrel masonry arch bridges are suitable for spans < 20 m.
  • Spans of masonry arch bridges range from a few meters to 146 m.
  • Concrete arch bridges are suitable for spans ranging from 35 m to 200 m, though there are some bridges with spans well over 200 m.
  • Steel and CFST (concrete-filled steel Tube) arch bridges have a larger capacity than the ones mentioned above, allowing larger spans because of the higher material strength.

 

3. Vortex Shedding

 

Vortex shedding should be taken into consideration when designing an arch bridge. There are times when an arch is identified that is having problems with hanger vibrations especially those with I-section hangers. These vibration issues are usually solved by connecting the hangers as shown below, reducing the length of the hangers, and changing their natural frequency.

 

Horizontal Cable Connecting HangersFigure 4. Horizontal Cable Connecting Hangers (The Bridge Engineering Handbook by Wai-Fah Chen and Lian Duan)

 

4. Buckling of Arch Rib

 

Since the curved rib of the arch bridge is subject to a high axial force, the chance of failure due to buckling of the rib must be taken into consideration when designing an arch bridge.

 

5. FEM Analysis

 

With the development of computer technology and its applications to structural analysis, various challenging arch shapes have turned up in practice that previously may have been imagined but were impossible to design. MIDAS has played a major role in the infrastructure of the world and MIDAS CIVIL has been used to design some of the most beautiful arch bridges in the world.

 

As an example, look at some of the MIDAS CIVIL project applications below:

Arch Bridge (Taipei, Taiwan)Figure 5. Arch Bridge (Taipei, Taiwan)

 

Steel Arch Bridge (Nanning, China)Figure 6. Steel Arch Bridge (Nanning, China)
 
 
Laguna Espanola Bridge, ArubaFigure 7. Laguna Española Bridge, Aruba 

 

 

Susbcribe
MIDAS Newsletter

Thank you, See you soon!
Share
About the Author
Edgar De Los Santos | Senior Engineer | MIDASoft Inc.

Edgar is a Senior Engineer at MIDASoft Inc. experienced in numerical modeling and bridge design and has over 8+ years of experience. Edgar has participated in the designs of Prestressed Girder Bridges and Segmental Bridges. Edgar pursued his Civil Engineering Degree from the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) and is currently pursuing a Master's Degree in Civil Engineering at the Universidad del Norte in Barranquilla, Colombia.

Comments
Project Application Download the
Project Application

Please fill out the below form to
download 80 Masterworks of Civil Engineering

All