Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil Español
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique Español
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • Sao Tome and Principe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain Español
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States of America English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

[Free Download] Nonlinear Time History Analysis of a 100-Year Arch Gravity Dam

March 23, 2026
BLOG BRIDGE INSIGHT
[Free Download] Nonlinear Time History Analysis of a 100-Year Arch Gravity Dam
7:23

 

Abstract 

 

This paper presents the assessment of the static and nonlinear dynamic responses of a nearly 100-year-old concrete arch-gravity dam located in Australia. Concrete coring and laboratory tests revealed the presence of debonded lift joints with calcite formation on the interfaces, raising uncertainty about the dam’s performance under flood and seismic loads that exceed the levels it had previously experienced. The dam’s load resistance is governed by the complex interaction of friction at the base and along unbonded lift joints and vertical contraction joints, cantilever action, as well as arch compression resisted by the abutments. Numerical analyses using 3D finite element modelling were performed to evaluate the dam’s stress and deformation behaviour under both static and dynamic loading conditions, focussing on the geometric nonlinear behaviour of joint interfaces. Additionally, stability evaluations were performed and assessed against ANCOLD (2013) acceptance criteria.

 

A finite element model that comprised the dam, foundation and interface joints was established using the software Midas FEA NX. Staged finite element analyses were performed, with the static analysis being baseline conditions. The dam is serviceability stage, and considering the age of the concrete, the heat of hydration has fully dissipated. 3D geometric nonlinear dynamic analysis was conducted using time history ground motions comprising two horizontal and one vertical components. The dynamic analysis was carried out for the significant duration of the ground motion, selected time history with 90% of Arias intensity. Damping ratios of 5% and 7% were considered for OBE and SEE loading scenarios respectively.

 

The extreme flood loading scenarios resulted in the highest static tensile stresses, while the safety evaluation earthquake caused the maximum tensile stress for seismic loading scenarios. The displacement analysis revealed that the maximum downstream displacement occurs under extreme flood conditions. Seismic events induce moderate displacement. The sliding factor of safety at the dam-foundation contact and at the lift joints, as well as the compressive and tensile stresses in the dam body, will remain within acceptable limits under all assessed load conditions. The results were used in a comprehensive risk assessment to assess the safety of the dam in accordance with regulatory guidelines.

 

 1. Introduction 

 

This paper presents the assessment of the performance of a nearly 100-year-old, 18 m high concrete gravity arch dam under both static and dynamic loading scenarios. Considering the age of the dam and the presence of calcite at the lift joints on the downstream face of the dam, concrete coring investigations were conducted during the safety review to assess the concrete condition and its parameters, along with assessing the state of the lift joints. The cores revealed the presence of debonded lift joints with calcite formation on the interfaces within the dam body, raising uncertainty about the dam’s performance when subjected to flood and seismic loads that exceed the levels it had previously experienced.

 

The dam’s load resistance is governed by the complex interaction of friction at the base and along unbonded lift joints and vertical contraction joints, cantilever action, as well as arch compression resisted by the abutments. The assessment considered static loads for various magnitude flood events, and dynamic loads resulting from various magnitude seismic activities. The numerical analyses were performed using a finite element model, focussing on the geometric non-linear behaviour of the joint interfaces. Additionally, stability evaluations were performed and assessed against acceptance criteria as outlined in the Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD), 2013.

 

The results were used to perform a comprehensive risk assessment in accordance with the ANCOLD Guidelines on Risk Assessment (ANCOLD, 2022), ensuring compliance with the Queensland regulatory Guidelines on Safety Assessments for Referable Dams (DRDMW, 2023).

 

2. Background and history of dam

 

The dam was constructed in 1929 for the purposes of town water supply. The dam is a concrete arch gravity type structure, which is curved in plan and relies on both arch action and gravity effects for stability. The dam has a central, uncontrolled spillway that discharges onto a roller bucket type dissipator. The upstream face of the dam is vertical whilst the downstream face has a slope of 1V:0.48H. The dam has an approximate height of 18.0 meters, measured from the lowest downstream toe level. It is designed to hold a full supply storage volume of 9,500 megalitres (ML), while its crest storage capacity reaches up to 13,000 ML.

 

 3. Concrete investigation 

 

Visual inspection of the downstream face found several seepages along some of lift joints and vertical contraction joints. As a result, concrete coring investigations were conducted during the safety review to assess the concrete condition and its parameters, along with assessing the state of the lift joints. Core samples were collected within the parent concrete and at the lift joints. The laboratory testing included compressive strength, tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, Poisson’s ratio, as well as total chloride and total sulphate content.

 

A key focus of the concrete investigation was the condition of joints. Based on ANCOLD Guidelines on Design Criteria for Concrete Gravity Dams (ANCOLD, 2013) “… unless there is strong evidence to support bonded lift joints all concrete lift joints should be considered as unbonded …”.

 

 When the samples arrived at the laboratory, it was observed that the lift joint surfaces were smooth and had a shiny appearance with a thin leached calcite formation. All the samples were fractured at the lift joint locations. Upon visual inspection of the joint surface condition, and in the absence of finding any bonded lift joints, for the purpose of the assessment, it was conservatively assumed that the joints are all currently unbonded. Direct shear testing could not be carried out due to the fractured samples.

 

Content visible until here

 

👉🏻 Download Now

Buttons_Click Here

 

Susbcribe
MIDAS Newsletter

Thank you, See you soon!
Share
Comments

Full Contents PDF Download

Fill in the form below and download the full version PDF file of the above content.