Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

The Comparison between AS3600:2018 and ACI318M-14 for ULS Design of Reinforcement Concrete

November 4, 2021
BLOG NEWS & TRENDS

OVERVIEW

The ACI318M (US codes) and AS3600 (Australian codes) are very similar in basic approach. In the current documents, but, there is a number of significant differences. Through this brief document, you can discover the differences between the two codes, understand their factors and design concepts.
In this document, a comparison between ACI 318M and AS3600 Code has 5 classified sections such as 1. Strength reduction factor, 2. Concrete rectangular stress block, 3. Strength Design in shear, 4. PM interaction, 5. Development length. In addition, the specific standards are based on the ACI318M-14 standards for US Codes, and AS3600:2018 for Australian codes.

 

 

 

 

Strength Reduction Factor 


The strength reduction factors are the same concept in both codes and ACI 318M-14 has different strength reduction factors for spirals (0.75) and rectangular ties (0.65), in compression controlled sections, and has 0.90 for the largest value for tension controlled section, besides 0.85 for AS3600.
And, ACI 318M applies an additional reduction factor to concrete stresses for sections under uniform compression, as an allowance for unspecified load eccentricity, whereas AS 3600 specifies a minimum eccentricity.
You can check the strength reduction factor (Ф) between each standard in the table below.

 

Building Code

AS3600:2018

ACI318M-14

Axial Force Without Bending

(Tension)

0.85

(for Class N reinforcement)

0.65 (& 0.75) to 0.90

Transition1: 0.65+0.25(εt-εty_/(0.005-εty)

Transition2: 0.75+0.15(εt-εty_/(0.005-εty)

 

Transition1:

for ties(fitments) reinforcement

Transition2:

for spirals(helices) reinforcement

Axial Force Without Bending

(Compression)

0.65

Bending Without Axial Forces

0.65 to 0.85

Transition: 1.24-13kuo/12

(for Class N reinforcement)

Shear and Torsion

0.75

(for Class N fitments are provided / (i) conditions)

0.75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concrete Rectangular Stress Block


You can check the strength reduction factor (Ф) between each standard in the table below.
One of the most significant is in the definition of the concrete rectangular compressive stress block, for the determination of the ultimate bending strength of beams.
The compressive stress block is an approximation to the actual stress distribution in a reinforced concrete member that takes advantage of the fact that the stress-strain curve of low to medium strength concrete has a wide plateau region where the maximum stress is maintained constant with increasing strain. In Section 8 of AS3600:3600 code, the factors were defined as;
Where α2 is the factor on the compressive stress and γ is the factor on the depth of the stress block. This variable is similar to the formula of the Canadian concrete standard (CAN-A23.3-04), and the upper limit (0.85) for the γ factor has been removed compared to the formula of the existing Australian code (AS3600-2009). In ACI 318M code, α2 and γ factor of AS3600 code are the same concepts as α2 and β1 factor respectively.
So, look at the comparison table below.

 
Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
Figure 1. Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
 

 

Building Code

AS3600:2018

ACI318M-14

α2

(α1 for ACI code)

0.85-0.0015 f’c ≥ 0.67

0.85

γ

(β1 for ACI code)

0.97-0.0025 f’c≥0.67

0.85 (fc ' ≤ 28)

0.85-0.05 (fc ' - 28) / 7 ≥ 0.65

εcu

(Ultimate strain of concrete)

0.0030

0.0030

Table 1. Comparison of Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block Factor

Note: f’c in MPa

 

Comparing α2 (Stress factor) and γ (Stress block depth factor) of AS3600: 2018 & ACI318M-14 between the two codes by concrete grade is as follows.

The graphs on the next page compare the stress block depth factor (Gamma) and the concrete stress factor (Alpha2) for AS 3600 and ACI 318M.

 
Figure 2a. Concrete Stress Factor (α2)
 
 
Figure 2b. Stress Block Depth Factor (γ)

 

The concrete stress factor (alpha2) shall be assumed uniformly distributed over an equivalent compression zone bounded by edges of the cross-section

 

The concrete stress factor (alpha2) applicable to the rectangular stress block in AS3600:2018 is decreases linearly from 0.85 as the concrete grade increases. In ACI 318M, but, the factor remains constant for all concrete grades, 0.85.
The Stress block depth factor (gamma2) for equivalent rectangular concrete stress distribution in AS3600:2018 is decreases linearly from 0.97 as the concrete grade increases. In ACI 318M, but, this value is 0.85 for the concrete grade below 28 MPa, and 0.65 for the concrete grade above 56 MPa. The values in between concrete grades use linear interpolation.

 

The combined effect of variation in the two factors is shown in the graphs below. The product of Gamma and Alpha2 is proportional to the force per unit width, and is referred to below as the Force Factor. The product of the Force Factor and (1 – Gamma/2) is proportional to the moment per unit width, and is referred to the Moment Factor.

 
 
Figure 3a. Force Factor vs Concrete Grade
 

 

 
Figure 3b. Moment Factor vs Concrete Grade
 

 

It can be seen that the force factor (α2*γ) value of n AS3600:2018 is larger than ACI318M up to 80MPa, but in the case of high strength grades over 80MPa, it is reversed and the ACI318M’s value is slightly larger than AS3600:2018’s.

 

For the moment factor, except for the low-strength grade below 10MPa, the moment factor of ACI318M is larger than AS3600:2018.

 

 

If you want to keep reading this article, please download the VOL.15 White Paper below.

 

Subscribe S.O.S Newsletter

Young-il Seo
Young-il Seo | Principal Structural Engineer

Young-il has over 13+ years of experience in building design, especially high-rise buildings with column reduction analysis, plant structures, pushover analysis, health monitoring, and vibration control projects. Since 2016, he is planning and providing technical supports for midas building products such as midas Gen, nGen, and Design+.

E-BOOK The Comparison between
AS3600:2018 and ACI318M-
14 for ULS Design of
Reinforcement Concrete

This book indicates the differences between the ACI318M and AS 3600.
Through this book, you can understand 5 classified section, which are
Strength Reduction Factor, Concrete Rectangular Stress Block, Strength Design in Shear,
PM Interaction, and Development Length.