Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

[Part 3. Damping method] Initial Load Optimization in Nonlinear Time History Analysis

midasBridge TeamMarch 7, 2024

📢 To check the entire series, click here

 

 

A. Damping Method

1. Modal & Direct Integration Analysis Method

   In this section, we will discuss the damping method applied to Nonlinear Boundary Time History Analysis.

   There are four types of damping methods.

  • Modal,
  • Mass & Stiffness Proportional,
  • Strain Energy Proportional,
  • Element Mass & Stiffness Proportional

 

Time History Load Cases - Damping Method

 

   The four damping methods are categorized for analysis purposes as follows.

 

 

   The method of applying damping varies depending on whether you want to apply the same damping to all elements of the structure or not.

   The options you choose also depend on whether you use the Modal or Direct Integration methods. The two methods differ in how they account for damping, which can lead to much longer analysis times depending on the selected damping method.

   Depending on the analysis method, the recommended damping method is as follows

  • For the Modal method, the damping is usually applied as "Modal".
  • For direct integration, the damping is generally set to "Mass & Stiffness Proportional".

 

2. Mass & Stiffness Proportional method

   The Mass & Stiffness Proportional method is Rayleigh Damping, which assumes that the damping matrix can be constructed as a linear sum of the mass and stiffness matrices, expressed by the equation below.

 

 

   Here, a and b are the damping coefficients, which can be represented by the natural frequency (w) and damping ratio (h) of the two modes.

 

 

I   n MIDAS CIVIL, enter the natural frequency (or period) and damping ratio (typically 0.05) for the two modes.

 

 

   A common question we get is what values should be entered for Mode 1 and Mode 2. (Is it enough to enter the period values for Mode 1 and Mode 2, or what period values should be entered?)

Let's take a look at a quick overview of Rayleigh Damping to get a better understanding.

 

 

 

   The graph above is for Rayleigh Damping (Mass - Stiffness Proportional Damping).
With two natural frequencies (or periods) and a damping ratio, the coefficients a and b can be calculated, and thus the damping ratio at any frequency can be calculated.
We typically apply a damping ratio of 0.05. However, the determination of two natural frequencies (W1 and W2) with a damping ratio of 0.05 requires engineering judgment.

 

 

 

You can check more of these details in the download file.

 

The remaining contents of 2. Mass & Stiffness Proportional method

B. Conclusion

[Part 2. Direct Integration method] Initial Load Optimization in Nonlinear Time History Analysis

midasBridge TeamFebruary 28, 2024

📢 To check the entire series, click here

 

   So when the Direct Integration method is used, how should we define the initial load?

   In this content, we will discuss the initial load of an analysis using the Nonlinear Direct Integration Method.

 

A. Definition of initial load for Direct Integration method.

   Defining the initial loading conditions is comparatively easier for nonlinear time history analysis using Direct Integration than for the Modal method.

   Let's take a look at the same example from Part 1 and see how the initial load is defined for the time history analysis using direct integration.

 

 

   The Analysis Method is selected as Direct Integration, and the End Time, Time Increment, and Step Number Increment for Output are the same as the Modal method in Part 1. (The "Order In Sequential loading" option can be considered for initial load consideration in Part 1, and selecting ST (static load case) is an inappropriate method for this option).

   In this content, we will see how to consider the initial load using Initial Load (Global Control) in the Nonlinear - Direct Integration method.

 

Initial Load (Global Control)

  • Active only for Nonlinear - Direct Integration analysis is a method for selecting load cases within Global Control and considering them as initial loads.
  • This option allows selecting multiple static Load cases, unlike Time-varying Static Loads where only one load can be selected.
  • It is the same as if you used the Time-Varying Static Loads option to perform a Nonlinear - Static analysis on a static load.

 

Figure 2. Time History Load Cases - Nonlinear(Analysis Type), Static(Analysis Method)

 

B. Initial Load (Global Control)

   Let's have a look at these options in a little more detail.

 

1. Time History Global Control

   In the Nonlinear-Direct Integration method, the initial load using Global Control is defined as follows.

 

Figure 3. Load > Dynamic Loads > Global Control

 

  1. Select "Perform Nonlinear Static Analysis for Initial Load",

  2. Select the static load cases to be considered as initial loads.

 

   With this setting, a nonlinear static analysis of the selected loads is performed. The results are used as initial conditions for the time history analysis.


 

2. Time History Load Cases

   After selecting Initial Load in Time History Global Control, select "Initial Load (Global Control)" in Time History Load Case as follows.

 

Figure 4. Nonlinear - Direct Integration with Initial Load(Global Control)

 

   The initial load applied in Global Control is considered as the constantly acting initial load. Therefore, "Keep Final Step Loads Constant" is always "Checked On".

 

"Cumulate D/V/A Results" is an option to select whether to combine the results of the time history analysis with the results of the initial load analysis.

 

   A detailed description of both options is explained in Part 1.

 

 

You can check more of these details in the download file.

 

3. Global Control (Initial load) / Nonlinear - Static method results comparison

C. Conclusions

Load Rating of Steel U-Through Bridge

midasBridge TeamJune 21, 2022

Please fill out the Download Section (Click here) below the Comment Section to download the Full Webinar PDF File 


 

In June 2020,  we hosted a webinar, “How I Design Bridge : Load Rating of Steel U-Through Bridge" by Abdullah Zaid, Senior Engineer/SMEC.

Load Rating of Steel U-Through Bridge

midasBridge TeamMarch 10, 2022

Please fill out the Download Section (Click here) below the Comment Section to download the Full Webinar PDF File

 

 


 

Load Rating of Steel U-Through Bridge

 

 

[PDF] "Dynamic Analysis of High Speed 2 Rail: HS2 Project"

midasBridge TeamFebruary 22, 2021

Please fill out the Download Section (Click here) below the Comment Section to download the Full Webinar PDF File.

 

To watch the full webinar video, click here.


 

Table of Contents 

*Click the content to move to the section

 

1. Introduction

2. When to go for Dynamic analysis?

3. Case Study

4. Conclusion


High-speed rail is becoming increasingly popular worldwide. Many countries are investing in high-speed rail as a way to reduce travel times, improve transportation efficiency, and reduce dependence on automobiles and air travel. The growth of high-speed rail has been driven by factors such as increasing urbanization, population growth, and the need to reduce carbon emissions from transportation.

Time History Analysis of Steel U-Girder Bridge

midasBridge TeamJune 15, 2020

Please fill out the Download Section (Click here) below the Comment Section to download the Full Webinar PDF File 

 

The fatigue analysis is one of the assessment methods of bridges. Time History Analysis can be used to calculate the fatigue stresses. In this course, we tried to broaden your understanding of functions that are for time history analysis in midas Civil. In addition, we walked through in detail the process of time history analysis. It will be helpful to most of the bridge engineers who handle the time history analysis.

Dynamic Analysis of Footbridges as per Eurocode

midasBridge TeamJune 8, 2020

Please fill out the Download Section (Click here) below the Comment Section to download the Full Webinar PDF File 


 

Steel composite footbridge Morava project is presented in this session. The structure is described with interesting remarks from the assembly. Practical experience on how to design footbridges that are sensitive to the load imposed by pedestrians is shared. After this session, bridge engineers will understand more deeply how to deal effectively with dynamically loaded bridges.