Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

Steel Ladder Deck Bridge Design

June 30, 2020
BLOG BRIDGE INSIGHT

This webinar shows a case study about the steel composite ladder deck girder bridge. The webinar will highlight major factors to consider in the design of this type of bridge, such as shear lag and buckling effects. It will provide recommendations on the suitability and use of different model types. Since many ladder deck bridges are constructed using the push launch method, special considerations for the construction sequence will be discussed.  


In this session, Martin Bosak from Barry Transportation shares the presentation regarding modeling approaches including the geometry, model properties, loads, and construction stage analysis with the steel ladder deck bridge.

 


This case study highlights:

 

1. Purpose of Different Model Types for Steel 

More than one type of structural model may be necessary for the steel bridge design. The speaker will talk about the purpose of different modeling methods and how those models can be created. 

 

 

2. Deck Slab Considerations

The presentation will discuss whether and how to include effects of shear lag in the concrete deck as well as cracked concrete over bridge supports.

 

 

3. Special Considerations for Push Launch Construction

The stability of the bare steel structure during construction may be a deciding factor in the design. The webinar will provide guidance in this important aspect of the bridge design.

 


 

1. Purpose of Different Model Types for Steel Bridge Design

 

The model for the case study is a steel composite ladder deck girder bridge. The bridge has twin steel girders and a concrete deck, and it is constructed by the Push Launch Method. Here you can find some information regarding the bridge. 

Details of the steel composite ladder deck girder bridge 2

 

Details of the steel composite ladder deck girder bridge

Fig. Details of the steel composite ladder deck girder bridge

 

Now, let's look at various modeling approaches. When we create and analyze a model, we have a number of options as a designer. Here are some approaches for modeling.

 


 

Approach no.1. 3D Frame(Grillage) Model

 

Purpose

- Construction stage analysis (Launch, deck construction)

- Global static analysis

- Support reactions (bearing design), deformations, member design and verification (main girder)

Grillage Model View and Bending Moment Diagram on Main Girder
Fig. Grillage Model View and Bending Moment Diagram on Main Girder

 


 

Approach no.2: Mixed Type Model

(Deck and main girder web as plates, crossbeams and/or girder flanges as line beams)

 

Purpose

- Stability verification during construction

- Transverse deck analysis and design

Transverse Bending of Deck Slab
Fig. Transverse Bending of Deck Slab

 

 

 


 

Approach no.3: Full Plate Model

(All elements modeled as plates, including crossbeams and stiffeners)

 

Purpose

- Detailed analysis of crossbeams

- Local verification (Stiffener buckling, local web buckling, stress concentrations)

Stress Concentration at Transverse Stiffener
Fig. Stress Concentration at Transverse Stiffener

 

Summary of Model Types


 

2. Deck Slab Considerations

 

If you decide to use the grillage model for your model, you have to consider some factors. In midas Civil, you can model each part using Composite section type and Steel section type, and you can use dummy elements to complete the grillage model.

 

Deck Slab Considerations

 

 

It is necessary to take into account the effects of shear lag in the concrete deck when you have the grillage model. There are provisions in Eurocode 4 on how to calculate participating width of a concrete slab. The steel composite ladder deck bridge has just 2 main girders. The distance of the 2 girders is not short so we need to calculate participating width called the effective width.

 

 

Deck Slab Considerations

Next, we need to check the effect of cracked concrete. We know that the tensile stresses or large hogging moments at the internal support make cracks at the concrete deck. It makes the stiffness of concrete to be decreased. In order to consider the effect, midas Civil provides the Section Manager to adjust the stiffness as the scale.

 

 

Adjustments of cracked concrete section with Section Manager
Fig. Adjustments of cracked concrete section with Section Manager

 

 

If you decide to use plate elements for your model, you don't need to deal with the effective width of the slab - the shear lag effect is included implicitly within FEM model. The effect of a cracked concrete slab over supports may be modeled by material properties of concrete (Reduced the elasticity modulus value, using the orthotropic material), and it is necessary to pay attention to proper mesh size and element shapes.

 

 

Details of girder made of plate elements
Fig. Details of girder made of plate elements

 

 


 

3. Special Considerations for Push Launch Construction

 

The steel ladder deck girder was constructed by using the push launch method. Here are the considerations for the push launch method.

 

Sketch of Critical Launching Positions

We have 2 options for the modeling approach of the push launch method. Depending on the designer's decision, automatic generation method or manual definition of several critical positions. 

 

Fig13

 

After the push launch work, we have the deck construction. We have 2 options for the deck construction to consider this work in SW. 

 

Deck Load Application on the Model

Deck Construction - Factors to Consider

 

We looked into considerations for the general design and modeling of a steel ladder deci\k bridge. In the next blog content, we will have time to check detailed modeling works with midas Civil.

 

 


 

Watch the full webinar video

 

 

 

Susbcribe
MIDAS Newsletter

Thank you, See you soon!
Share
Martin Bosak | Senior Engineer | Barry Transportation

Martin Bosak has over 15 years of experience in structure design such as concrete and steel bridges, road, rail, and foot bridge design.

Bridge designer in major infrastructure projects across Europe:
- Czech Republic (D3 Motorway, R48 Expressway, I/11)
- Slovakia (D3 Motorway)
- UK (A5 Northern Ireland, A737 Scotland)
- Ireland (M3 Motorway, N9/N10, M17/M18) 

Comments
Download Download the Webinar
Presentation file

midas Civil Case Study of the Steel Ladder Deck Bridge Design

All