Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

Abutment Design Guidelines in AASHTO LRFD - Stability Check for Spread Footing

December 21, 2023
BLOG BRIDGE INSIGHT

This part checks the stability of the abutment with a spread footing. The stability review will follow the "AASHTO LRFD section 11 - Abutments, Piers and Walls". The Service Limit State and Strength Limit State will be reviewed following details below.

 

11.6.2 Movement and Stability at Service Limit State

11.5.2 Differential Vertical Settlement

11.6.2.3 Overall Stability

11.6.3 Bearing Resistance and Stability at Strength Limit State

11.6.3.2 Bearing Resistance

11.6.3.3 Overturning (Eccentricity Limits)

11.6.3.6 Sliding

 

🔖 Tips


The Overall stability is reviewed as a Service Limit State in AASHTO LRFD (SI) 2007; however, the overall stability is reviewed as a Strength Limit State in 9th Edition 2020.

Additionally, the 2007 standards use the term "Overturning," while the 2020 standards use "Eccentricity Limits."

 

A. Bearing Resistance

Bearing resistance is reviewed according to "AASHTO LRFD 11.6.3.2 Bearing Resistance". The bearing resistance is reviewed by comparing the vertical stress of the foundation floor surface calculated with factored loads at the Strength Limit State and the resistances (bearing resistance provided in the geotechnical report).

The standards provide methods for calculating soil pressure distribution for abutments supported on soil and rock.

 

The Bearing Stress of footing on soil

When a structure is supported by soil, the vertical stress is assumed to be uniformly distributed pressure, as shown in the figure below. The vertical stress will have a parabolic distribution for footings placed at shallow depths in the soil. However, the vertical stress distribution will be nearly uniform if the footing is placed deep enough.

In addition, assuming that the vertical stress is uniform regardless of the type of soil supporting the structure can lead to a conservative design for simplified footing design.

 

AASHTO LRFD Figure 11.6.3.2-1 Bearing Stress Criteria for Conventional Wall Foundation on Soil

AASHTO LRFD Figure 11.6.3.2-1 Bearing Stress Criteria for Conventional Wall Foundation on Soil

 

The vertical stress can be calculated as follows:

 

The vertical stress calculation 1

The vertical stress calculation 1

 

The eccentricity “e” can be calculated from the sum of the vertical force and the moment. The vertical force and moment that need to be considered in the eccentricity calculation are shown in the figure below.

 

The e and e0 can be calculated from the sum of the vertical force and the moment about point 'O'.

Eccentricity of Resultant ForceEccentricity of Resultant Force

 

The Bearing Stress of footing on the rock

   If the structure is supported by rock, the vertical stress is assumed as linearly distributed pressure, as shown in the figure. The maximum vertical stress occurs at the toe of the footing, while the minimum vertical stress occurs at the heel. This distribution varies depending on the e location where the resultant force is applied.

   The location where the resultant force acts should be within the middle third of the footing width (e < B/6) for better design efficiency. Suppose the location of the resultant force is beyond the middle third of the footing width (e > B/6). In that case, a triangular stress distribution will occur, causing large compressive stress on one side, which can lead to problems such as soil failure or differential settlement.

 

AASHTO LRFD Figure 11.6.3.2-2 Bearing Stress Criteria for Conventional Wall Foundation on RockAASHTO LRFD Figure 11.6.3.2-2 Bearing Stress Criteria for Conventional Wall Foundation on Rock

 

🔖 Tips


   The standard for e is B/6 is related to the Kern Boundary. The vertical stress acting on the foundation can be calculated as the sum of the axial stress (P/A) and the bending stress (Mc/I).

   When the axial stress and bending stress are equal, the eccentricity can be calculated, and the kern boundary is B/6 of a rectangular foundation.

 

The vertical stressThe vertical stress

 

The eccentricity calculation

The eccentricity calculation

 

   If the resultant is outside the middle one-third of the foundation. The vertical stress can be calculated as follows:

 

The vertical stress calculation 2The vertical stress calculation 2

 

The vertical stress calculation 3

The vertical stress calculation 3

 

🔖 Tips


   When a structure is supported by rock, the vertical stress equation can be used to derive the following steps.

   In this case, the length L of the structure is calculated in units of meters (1m).

 

The resultant is within the middle one-third of the foundationThe resultant is within the middle one-third of the foundation

 

   When e is greater than B/6, the vertical stress distribution becomes triangular. And the axial force acts at the centroid of the triangular stress distribution. In this case, the maximum vertical stress can be calculated as follows:

 

The resultant is outside the middle one-third of the foundation

The resultant is outside the middle one-third of the foundation

 

B. Overturning (Eccentricity Limits)

 

   The overturning of a structure is evaluated based on the overturning moment and the stabilizing moment calculated with the front of the footing toe (Point 'o'). The moment generated by the horizontal earth pressure results in the overturning moment that rotates the structure forward, while the self-weight of the structure and the weight of the backfill soil generate the stabilizing moment that rotates the structure backward.

 

Content visible until here

 

You can check more of these details in the download file.


 

Foundation on soil

Foundation on rock

C. Failure by Sliding

D. Differential Vertical Settlement

Susbcribe
MIDAS Newsletter

Thank you, See you soon!
Share
About the Author
Jae wook Kim | MIDAS IT Technical Support Engineer

He has experience in analysis and design using FEM software, especially structural engineering. He also has a deep knowledge of various structural engineering projects.

Comments

Continuing Full Contents.

Fill out the below form to download the Full Contents.