Would you like to sign out?

    Bridge

    Comparison of Theoretical and Software Results of Prestressed Tendon Loss

    BLOG BRIDGE INSIGHT

    With the advent of the IT era in the 21st century, information that was previously unavailable in the engineering market has become possible. Engineering simulation using a computer program is one of them, and it is currently used in most engineering industries.


    In order to perform a correct structural analysis simulation using such a computer analysis program, it is necessary to compare and verify the contents of engineering theory and the results calculated by the program. It is an essential process in industries such as construction and transportation, which are directly related to human safety.

     

    Comparison of Theoretical and Software Results of Prestressed Tendon Loss

     

    In this post, we will compare the theoretical contents to the analysis results in a structural analysis program about the prestressed concrete equilibrium equation and the prestressed tendon loss.

     

    PSC bridge is a bridge type that secures the stability of the structure by introducing artificial deformation and stress using tendon to the concrete member. The stress introduction by tendon depends on the tendon shape and tension. The shape of the tendon is defined as the distance from the neutral axis of the member. If the neutral axis changes for each construction stage, such as the composite section in the construction stage, this should be appropriately reflected.

     

    Tension can be divided into immediate losses, such as friction or anchorage losses, and time-dependent losses that occur as the construction stage progresses, such as elasticity change or relaxation. Such tendon losses must be properly reflected in the analysis.

     


     

    1. Verification of Equivalent Tendon Force

     

    Assuming that there is no Tendon Losses, the equivalent tendon force is calculated as follows.

    Verification of Equivalent Tendon Force
    Case. Simple beam model with the tendon placed in a curve.

     

     

    Material and section properties are following:

     

    Modulus of Elasticity (Conc),

    Ec

    10,000

    Modulus of Elasticity (Steel)

    Es

    150,000

    Area of Steel

    Ast

    0.01

    Yield Stress

    Fy

    100,000

    Diameter of Duct

    dduct

    0.04 m

    Tensile Stress

    fso

    80,000

    Eccentricity

    ei

    0.3 m

    Span length

    L

    10 m

     

    → Theoretical approach method and calculation results

     

    i. Calculate the tension force at each at each L/4 position for one beam, and calculation the equivalent tendon force acting on the beam. Ignoring the tendon losses, the tension at each L/4 position of the beam is as follows.

     

    ii. Here, the arrangement of the tendons in each section is assumed to be linear.

     

    Theoretical approach method and calculation results 1Theoretical approach method and calculation results 2Theoretical approach method and calculation results 3

     

    iii. The neutral axis moves because the area of the tension member and the duct is calculated as a transformed cross section. Where, each position is described as e0=i, e1=1/4, e2=2/4.

     

    Theoretical approach method and calculation results 4

     

    After the change of the neutral axis by the effective section,

    Theoretical approach method and calculation results 5

     

    iv. Where Pi=Pj and ei=ej,

    Theoretical approach method and calculation results 6

     

    Therefore, the equivalent tendon force acting on each section is shown in the below figure.

     

    Theoretical approach method and calculation results 7Theoretical approach method and calculation results 8

    v. Member force diagram

    Member force diagram

     

     

    → Modelling and structural analysis result by midas Civil

     

    i. Input Model

    Input Model

    ii. Input Load

    Input load

    iii. Analysis Results

    Analysis Results

    → Comparison of theoretical results and analysis results using midas Civil

    Comparison of theoretical results and analysis results using midas Civil


     

     

    2. Tendon Losses due to Friction, Anchorage Slip, and Relaxation

     

    Case. Simple beam model with the tendon placed in a curve
    Case. Simple beam model with the tendon placed in a curve

     

    Material and section properties are following:

     

    Modulus of Elasticity (Conc)

      Ec

    10,000

     

    Anchorage slip

    Lslip

    0.05 m

    Modulus of Elasticity (Steel)

      Es

    150,000

     

    Relaxation coefficient

    Crelax

    45

    Area of Steel

      Ast

    0.01

     

    Curvature friction factor

    μ

    0.3

    Yield Stress

      Fy

    100,000

     

    Wobble friction factor

    k

    0.0066/m

    Diameter of Duct

      dduct

    0.04 m

     

     

    t1

    100 day

    Tensile Stress

      fso

    80,000

     

     

    Eccentricity

      ei

    0.3 m

     

     

     

      ej

    0.3 m

     

     

    Span length

     L

    10 m

     

     

     

     

     

    Theoretical approach method and calculation results

     

    i) Loss due to friction


    The tension at each L/4 point is as follows.

     

    i) Loss due to friction

     

     

     

    ii) Loss due to anchorage slip


    Let the length of the tendon subject to reverse friction be set, calculate the tendon loss due to settlement activity based on where this length is in any of the four sections.

    Loss due to anchorage slipTendon loss graph by anchorage slip

     

     

     

    (a) Section I 

    Section I(b) Section ii 

    Section ii 

    The rest remains, PL/2, P3L/4, PL unchanged.

     

     

    iii) Loss due to relaxation

     

    Loss due to relaxation is calculated as follows.

    Loss due to relaxationHere, fsi is the stress before loss due to relaxation occurs, and t is the elapsed time (hr). Crelax is relaxation coefficient (45 in this example), and fy (100,000 N/m2) is yield stress.

    Therefore, the tension force considering the loss due to relaxation at each point is as follows.
    the tension force considering the loss due to relaxation at each point

    → Modelling and structural analysis result by midas Civil

     

    i) Input Model

    Modelling and structural analysis result by midas Civil 1

    ii) Input Load

    Modelling and structural analysis result by midas Civil 2

     

     

     

    iii) Analysis Results

     

    (a) Loss due to friction

    Loss due to frictionLoss due to friction

     

    (b) Loss due to anchorage slip

    2930

     

    (c) Loss due to relaxation

    Loss due to anchorage slip 232-1

     

    → Comparison of theoretical results and analysis results using midas Civil

     

    → Comparison of theoretical results and analysis results using midas Civil
    Subscribe to Newsletter

    Catch the weekly engineer news!

    TaeGook Kim | Technical Engineer | MIDASIT

    - Civil engineer within MIDASIT Technical Planning Team

    - Over 3 years of experience in technical and marketing for MIDAS Programs

    What you may
    also like

    Subscribe to Newsletter

    Catch the weekly engineer news!