Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

Comparison of Theoretical and Software Results of Prestressed Tendon Loss

October 23, 2020
BLOG BRIDGE INSIGHT

With the advent of the IT era in the 21st century, information that was previously unavailable in the engineering market has become possible. Engineering simulation using a computer program is one of them, and it is currently used in most engineering industries.


In order to perform a correct structural analysis simulation using such a computer analysis program, it is necessary to compare and verify the contents of engineering theory and the results calculated by the program. It is an essential process in industries such as construction and transportation, which are directly related to human safety.

 

Comparison of Theoretical and Software Results of Prestressed Tendon Loss

 

In this post, we will compare the theoretical contents to the analysis results in a structural analysis program about the prestressed concrete equilibrium equation and the prestressed tendon loss.

 

PSC bridge is a bridge type that secures the stability of the structure by introducing artificial deformation and stress using tendon to the concrete member. The stress introduction by tendon depends on the tendon shape and tension. The shape of the tendon is defined as the distance from the neutral axis of the member. If the neutral axis changes for each construction stage, such as the composite section in the construction stage, this should be appropriately reflected.

 

Tension can be divided into immediate losses, such as friction or anchorage losses, and time-dependent losses that occur as the construction stage progresses, such as elasticity change or relaxation. Such tendon losses must be properly reflected in the analysis.

 


 

1. Verification of Equivalent Tendon Force

 

Assuming that there is no Tendon Losses, the equivalent tendon force is calculated as follows.

Verification of Equivalent Tendon Force
Case. Simple beam model with the tendon placed in a curve.

 

 

Material and section properties are following:

 

Modulus of Elasticity (Conc),

Ec

10,000

Modulus of Elasticity (Steel)

Es

150,000

Area of Steel

Ast

0.01

Yield Stress

Fy

100,000

Diameter of Duct

dduct

0.04 m

Tensile Stress

fso

80,000

Eccentricity

ei

0.3 m

Span length

L

10 m

 

→ Theoretical approach method and calculation results

 

i. Calculate the tension force at each at each L/4 position for one beam, and calculation the equivalent tendon force acting on the beam. Ignoring the tendon losses, the tension at each L/4 position of the beam is as follows.

 

ii. Here, the arrangement of the tendons in each section is assumed to be linear.

 

Theoretical approach method and calculation results 1Theoretical approach method and calculation results 2Theoretical approach method and calculation results 3

 

iii. The neutral axis moves because the area of the tension member and the duct is calculated as a transformed cross section. Where, each position is described as e0=i, e1=1/4, e2=2/4.

 

Theoretical approach method and calculation results 4

 

After the change of the neutral axis by the effective section,

Theoretical approach method and calculation results 5

 

iv. Where Pi=Pj and ei=ej,

Theoretical approach method and calculation results 6

 

Therefore, the equivalent tendon force acting on each section is shown in the below figure.

 

Theoretical approach method and calculation results 7Theoretical approach method and calculation results 8

v. Member force diagram

Member force diagram

 

 

→ Modelling and structural analysis result by midas Civil

 

i. Input Model

Input Model

ii. Input Load

Input load

iii. Analysis Results

Analysis Results

→ Comparison of theoretical results and analysis results using midas Civil

Comparison of theoretical results and analysis results using midas Civil


 

 

2. Tendon Losses due to Friction, Anchorage Slip, and Relaxation

 

Case. Simple beam model with the tendon placed in a curve
Case. Simple beam model with the tendon placed in a curve

 

Material and section properties are following:

 

Modulus of Elasticity (Conc)

  Ec

10,000

 

Anchorage slip

Lslip

0.05 m

Modulus of Elasticity (Steel)

  Es

150,000

 

Relaxation coefficient

Crelax

45

Area of Steel

  Ast

0.01

 

Curvature friction factor

μ

0.3

Yield Stress

  Fy

100,000

 

Wobble friction factor

k

0.0066/m

Diameter of Duct

  dduct

0.04 m

 

 

t1

100 day

Tensile Stress

  fso

80,000

 

 

Eccentricity

  ei

0.3 m

 

 

 

  ej

0.3 m

 

 

Span length

 L

10 m

 

 

 

 

 

Theoretical approach method and calculation results

 

i) Loss due to friction


The tension at each L/4 point is as follows.

 

i) Loss due to friction

 

 

 

ii) Loss due to anchorage slip


Let the length of the tendon subject to reverse friction be set, calculate the tendon loss due to settlement activity based on where this length is in any of the four sections.

Loss due to anchorage slipTendon loss graph by anchorage slip

 

 

 

(a) Section I 

Section I(b) Section ii 

Section ii 

The rest remains, PL/2, P3L/4, PL unchanged.

 

 

iii) Loss due to relaxation

 

Loss due to relaxation is calculated as follows.

Loss due to relaxationHere, fsi is the stress before loss due to relaxation occurs, and t is the elapsed time (hr). Crelax is relaxation coefficient (45 in this example), and fy (100,000 N/m2) is yield stress.

Therefore, the tension force considering the loss due to relaxation at each point is as follows.
the tension force considering the loss due to relaxation at each point

→ Modelling and structural analysis result by midas Civil

 

i) Input Model

Modelling and structural analysis result by midas Civil 1

ii) Input Load

Modelling and structural analysis result by midas Civil 2

 

 

 

iii) Analysis Results

 

(a) Loss due to friction

Loss due to frictionLoss due to friction

 

(b) Loss due to anchorage slip

2930

 

(c) Loss due to relaxation

Loss due to anchorage slip 232-1

 

→ Comparison of theoretical results and analysis results using midas Civil

 

→ Comparison of theoretical results and analysis results using midas Civil

Susbcribe
MIDAS Newsletter

Thank you, See you soon!
Share
TaeGook Kim | Technical Engineer | MIDASIT

- Civil engineer within MIDASIT Technical Planning Team

- Over 3 years of experience in technical and marketing for MIDAS Programs

Comments