Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

Rail-Structure Interaction for Double track bridge

June 13, 2024
BLOG BRIDGE INSIGHT

The Whole New MIDAS Site Banner

 

1. Introduction

In our previous content, we discussed how we can control the additional stress for RSI when it is beyond the permissible limit for a single track. In this content, we will explore more about RSI when two tracks are present. such as how to find the critical position of the vehicle, and controlling measures when stresses are beyond permissible limits.

 

The key topics include:

  • The critical vehicle position and loads consideration
  • How to control additional stress when stress is beyond permissible limit

 

Rail structure interaction (RSI) plays a crucial role in the design and analysis of railway tracks. Especially in double-track configurations, where two tracks run parallel to each other, the RSI becomes more complex compared to a single-track system. The interaction between the tracks and the supporting structures can affect various aspects of the railway system, including track stability, passenger comfort, etc. Through RSI analysis, engineers can evaluate the performance of the railway tracks, identify potential issues or areas of improvement, optimize the design to enhance track stability and reduce maintenance requirements.

 

2. UIC 774-3 Recommendation

When two tracks are present on the bridge the critical vehicle position should be determined by considering the number of load cases i.e., changing the vehicle position for both the tracks with load suggested by UIC 774-3 guidelines to obtain the critical stress. In previous content, detailed information regarding the different types of load and their combination is present. So, in this part, we will discuss the additional consideration when the double-track is present as per UIC 774-3 guidelines.

 

  • Temperature load

Similar to the single track, the following temperature load should be considered as per UIC 774-3.

Rail = ± 50 °C

Bridge = ± 35 °C

 

  • Braking, Acceleration and Vertical load

As per UIC 744-3 (2.2.1), for a bridge with two tracks, the braking force on one track and acceleration force on the other should be considered”.

Acceleration: qlak= 33 kN/m per track, with L x qlak ≤ 1000 kN

Braking: qlbk= 20 kN/m per track, with L x qlbk ≤ 6000 kN

 

3. Problem Statement

Let’s consider the 3-span box girder bridge configuration similar to Part 1 with 2 tracks scenario, and perform the RSI to evaluate the additional stress.

 

1 Deck type PSC Box Girder
2 Number of track 2
3 Span length 40m + 60m + 40m
4 Longitudinal Stiffness of Support 60000 kN/m
5 Pier height 7.5m

 

3.1 Material and Section Properties

The material and section properties used for modelling are as follows.

 

  • Deck section
Grade of Concrete C40/50
Modulus of Elasticity,E 3.522e+07 kN/m2
Cross Section Area, A 10.52 m2
Moment of Inertia, Iyy 11.89 m4
Height of the section, H 3 m
Neutral Axis of the Section 1.70 m
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion, α 1e-05

 

Untitled

Figure 3.1 PSC box section property definition in MIDAS CIVIL

 

  • Rail Section
Modulus of Elasticity,E 2.10e+08 kN/m2
Cross Section Area, A 1.54e-02 m2
Moment of Inertia, Iyy 6.07e-05 m4
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion, α 1.20e-05

 

Untitled 1

Figure 3.2 UIC 60 rail properties

 

  • Elastic Link

To consider the rail-structure interaction elastic link is used with a bi-linear force deformation function as specified in UIC 774-3.

 

Untitled 2

Figure 3.3 Longitudinal resistance of the ballast (UIC 774-3)

 

3.2 Modelling in MIDAS CIVIL

Rail structure Interaction is considered for a 2-cell PSC box girder bridge with a double track having a deck width of 10m, and 3 spans of length 40m, 60m and 40m of the uniform cross-section is considered. For modelling, the bridge section & rail section are modelled using the beam elements, to consider the rail-structure interaction elastic link is used with a bi-linear force deformation function which has different resistance of ballast (loaded/ unloaded condition) depending on the presence of train loads as shown in the above image.

 

ℹ️ Simplified separate analysis for temperature variation, braking/ acceleration force and vertical deflection is considered, and the results are combined assuming the principle of superposition.

 

Untitled 3

Figure 3.4 Schematic diagram for RSI modelling in MIDAS CIVIL

 

Untitled 4

Figure 3.5 Double track bridge simulation in the program

 

3.3 Rail Structure Interaction (RSI) results

  • Temperature Load

Similar to the single track condition, the uniform temperature load of 35°C is applied to the deck as per UIC 774-3 guidelines to evaluate the additional stress due to RSI on both tracks. Since there is no rail expansion device present to accommodate for thermal expansion and contraction of the rails, the resulting stress in the rails will remain constant and will not account for any additional stress caused by temperature variation.

 

Untitled 5

Figure 3.6 Axial stress in rail (Temperature load)

 

  • Braking/ Acceleration and Vertical Load

For the case of a double-track bridge, it is necessary to consider the braking force on one track and the acceleration force on the other track. However, for the double-track bridge, many load cases have to be considered to find the critical vehicle position and maximum additional stress due to RSI. For the above case, the total length of rail is 740m including abutments on both the side and considering the interval of 10m for change in vehicle position, the total number of load cases would be 10952 [5476 (74*74) * 2 (for train running in both the direction)].
Analyzing each and every possible load case can be a time-consuming process. In order to reduce the number of analyses, engineers can rely on their expertise and past experience to identify critical locations where the maximum additional stress due to the Rail Structure Interaction (RSI) occurs. Typically, the most critical locations are near the supports and the mid-span of the bridge. By focusing the analysis on these key locations, engineers can reduce the number of load cases that need to be considered.
For this case, the following critical location is selected as shown in the below image.

 

Content visible until here

 

You can check more of these details in the download file.

3.4 Rail Structure Interaction (RSI) with Zero Longitudinal Restraint (ZLR) Fastener

3.4.1 How to consider ZLR in modelling

3.5 Rail Structure Interaction (RSI) Results with ZLR

4. Conclusion

Susbcribe
MIDAS Newsletter

Thank you, See you soon!
Share
About the Author
Sagar Gohil | Structural Technician | MIDAS IT India

Sagar has years of design experience in different types of structures including PSC Integral bridges, Box culverts, and Residential and commercial buildings. He pursued his master's degree from IIT Roorkee and is experienced in handling complex technical issues related to bridges.

Comments

Continuing Full Contents.

Fill out the below form to download the Full Contents.