Would you like to sign out?

Select Country

  • Afghanistan English
  • Albania English
  • Algeria English
  • American Samoa English
  • Andorra English
  • Angola English
  • Anguilla English
  • Antarctica English
  • Antigua and Barbuda English
  • Argentina Español
  • Armenia English
  • Aruba English
  • Australia English
  • Austria English
  • Azerbaijan English
  • Bahamas English
  • Bahrain English
  • Bangladesh English
  • Barbados English
  • Belarus English
  • Belgium English
  • Belize English
  • Benin English
  • Bermuda English
  • Bhutan English
  • Bolivia Español
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina English
  • Botswana English
  • Bouvet Island English
  • Brazil English
  • British Indian Ocean Territory English
  • British Virgin Islands English
  • Brunei English
  • Bulgaria English
  • Burkina Faso English
  • Burundi English
  • Cambodia English
  • Cameroon English
  • Canada English
  • Cape Verde English
  • Caribbean Netherlands English
  • Cayman Islands English
  • Central African Republic English
  • Chad English
  • Chile Español
  • Christmas Island English
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands English
  • Colombia Español
  • Comoros English
  • Congo English
  • Cook Islands English
  • Costa Rica Español
  • Côte d’Ivoire English
  • Croatia English
  • Cuba Español
  • Curaçao English
  • Cyprus English
  • Czech Republic English
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo English
  • Denmark English
  • Djibouti English
  • Dominica English
  • Dominican Republic Español
  • Ecuador Español
  • Egypt English
  • El Salvador Español
  • Equatorial Guinea English
  • Eritrea English
  • Estonia English
  • Ethiopia English
  • Falkland Islands English
  • Faroe Islands English
  • Fiji English
  • Finland English
  • France English
  • French Guiana Español
  • French Polynesia English
  • French Southern Territories English
  • Gabon English
  • Gambia English
  • Georgia English
  • Germany English
  • Ghana English
  • Gibraltar English
  • Greece English
  • Greenland English
  • Grenada English
  • Guadeloupe Español
  • Guam English
  • Guatemala Español
  • Guernsey English
  • Guinea English
  • Guinea-Bissau English
  • Guyana English
  • Haiti Español
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands English
  • Honduras Español
  • Hong Kong English
  • Hungary English
  • Iceland English
  • India English
  • Indonesia English
  • Iran English
  • Iraq English
  • Ireland English
  • Isle of Man English
  • Israel English
  • Italy English
  • Jamaica English
  • Japan 日本語
  • Jersey English
  • Jordan English
  • Kazakhstan English
  • Kenya English
  • Kiribati English
  • South Korea 한국어
  • Kuwait English
  • Kyrgyzstan English
  • Laos English
  • Latvia English
  • Lebanon English
  • Lesotho English
  • Liberia English
  • Libya English
  • Liechtenstein English
  • Lithuania English
  • Luxembourg English
  • Macau English
  • Madagascar English
  • Malawi English
  • Malaysia English
  • Maldives English
  • Mali English
  • Malta English
  • Marshall Islands English
  • Martinique English
  • Mauritania English
  • Mauritius English
  • Mayotte English
  • Mexico Español
  • Micronesia English
  • Moldova English
  • Monaco English
  • Mongolia English
  • Montenegro English
  • Montserrat English
  • Morocco English
  • Mozambique English
  • Myanmar English
  • Namibia English
  • Nauru English
  • Nepal English
  • Netherlands English
  • New Caledonia English
  • New Zealand English
  • Nicaragua Español
  • Niger English
  • Nigeria English
  • Niue English
  • Norfolk Island English
  • Northern Mariana Islands English
  • Norway English
  • Oman English
  • Pakistan English
  • Palau English
  • Palestine English
  • Panama Español
  • Papua New Guinea English
  • Paraguay Español
  • Peru Español
  • Philippines English
  • Pitcairn Islands English
  • Poland English
  • Portugal Español
  • Puerto Rico Español
  • Qatar English
  • Réunion English
  • Romania English
  • Russia English
  • Rwanda English
  • Saint Barthélemy Español
  • Saint Helena English
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis English
  • Saint Lucia English
  • Saint Martin Español
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon English
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines English
  • Samoa English
  • San Marino English
  • São Tomé and Príncipe English
  • Saudi Arabia English
  • Senegal English
  • Serbia English
  • Seychelles English
  • Sierra Leone English
  • Singapore English
  • Sint Maarten English
  • Slovakia English
  • Slovenia English
  • Solomon Islands English
  • Somalia English
  • South Africa English
  • South Georgia English
  • South Sudan English
  • Spain English
  • Sri Lanka English
  • Sudan English
  • Suriname English
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen English
  • Eswatini English
  • Sweden English
  • Switzerland English
  • Syria English
  • Taiwan English
  • Tajikistan English
  • Tanzania English
  • Thailand English
  • Togo English
  • Tokelau English
  • Tonga English
  • Trinidad and Tobago English
  • Tunisia English
  • Turkey English
  • Turkmenistan English
  • Turks and Caicos Islands English
  • Tuvalu English
  • U.S. Virgin Islands English
  • Uganda English
  • Ukraine English
  • United Arab Emirates English
  • United Kingdom English
  • United States English
  • U.S. Minor Outlying Islands English
  • Uruguay Español
  • Uzbekistan English
  • Vanuatu English
  • Vatican City English
  • Venezuela Español
  • Vietnam English
  • Wallis and Futuna English
  • Western Sahara English
  • Yemen English
  • Zambia English
  • Zimbabwe English
  • Åland Islands English
  • East Timor English
  • Netherlands Antilles English
  • Serbia and Montenegro English
  • North Macedonia English
  • Timor-Leste English

Guidelines for Tunnel Design

November 17, 2022
BLOG NEWS & TRENDS

 

Guidelines for Tunnel Design


Please fill out the Download Section (Click here) below the Comment Section to download the Complete Guide to Composite Sections

 

 

 

Table of Contents 

 

1. Introduction

2. Earth Pressure Balance Tunnel Boring Machine

3. Research Design and Standards Organisation (RDSO): Tunnel Design

4. What's Next

 


 

 

1. Introduction

 

Hello readers…ever wondered about the factors which generally affect any tunnel design. Well, you can go through some of them now. Tunnel design is mostly affected by the type of tunnel whether it is a shallow tunnel or a deep tunnel.

City Metro lines are the most common example of a shallow tunnel. Deep tunnels are less influenced by the variation of in situ stress with depth. This is because the in-situ stress difference between tunnel crown and invert is not significant compared to absolute value of in situ stress at the depth. Ground deformations resulting from soil plasticization led to surface settlements due to limited overburden height in shallow tunnels and thus damage the surface structures. Support pressure should be applied properly to facilitate redistribution of stresses around the tunnel minimizing surface settlements. The excessive overburden height in deep tunnels can lead to tunnel collapse if support measures are not properly defined.

 

Figure 1. Metro Line Construction

Figure 1: Metro Line Construction

 

 

Figure 2. TMB cutterhead being lowered underground

 Figure 2: TBM cutterhead being lowered underground

 

 

2. Earth Pressure Balance Tunnel Boring Machine

 

Let us understand the general design guidelines with the help of an example.

We can talk about the design considerations for a metro project constructed using Earth Pressure Balance Tunnel Boring Machine (EPB TBM). The prime requirement in any tunnel design is fixing the tunnel alignment, after this comes the knowledge about the geology and geotechnical conditions along the alignment. The ground parameters can be determined from field tests, laboratory tests, boring, sampling, geophysical surveys, etc. The number of boreholes required along the tunnel alignment will again depend on geological complexity.

 

Borehole distance can be increased where the stratigraphy is uniform. It is necessary to collect information about the types of soil and rocks present in the area and their properties. The basic properties essential for tunnel design include Modulus of Elasticity, effective cohesion, effective friction angle and unit weight of the soil formation.


The plasticity zone is governed by effective cohesion and friction angle while surface settlements are controlled by the modulus of elasticity. For an EPB TBM, soil deformations are mainly affected by volume loss from face extrusion, radial loss on the shield and annular void between segmental lining and soil. The principle behind operation of earth pressure balance tunnel boring machine is that excavation is done in such a way that the face pressure equalizes the pressure of the excavated material supporting the tunnel face. This type of TBM is specially designed to bore through soft ground conditions with high water table, water under pressure or loose deposits. Water inflows are localized in case of hard rock tunnels, but in soft ground, water is likely to carry some of the ground with it.

 

The EPB TBM uses the excavated soil as a support medium for the face, the mixing arms on the cutting wheel make a paste out of the excavated soil of the required texture and the thrust cylinder pressure is transferred to this paste such that the soil paste pressure in the excavation chamber equalizes the surrounding soil and groundwater pressure. The cutterhead is separated from the remaining part of the machine by a bulkhead, the confinement pressure is maintained to support excavation and balance hydrostatic groundwater pressure. The pressure inside the cutterhead chamber is continuously monitored and adjusted to check face stability and ground subsidence. Sometimes, the excavated soil is mixed with foam, polymer or bentonite to acquire the needed viscosity and thickness. Pressure is maintained by controlling rate of extraction of spoil and advance rate.

 

 

Figure 3. TBM on subway station

 

Figure 3: TBM on subway station

 

 

3. Research Design and Standards Organisation (RDSO): Tunnel Design

 

RDSO is an ISO 9001 research and development organization under the Ministry of Railways of government of India. Let us get acquainted to some design guidelines specified by RDSO. Tunnel design must achieve functionality, stability, and safety of the tunnel opening during and after construction and for the total functioning duration of the underground structure. Here what we understand from tunnel design is design of initial ground support as well as permanent support system. One can go for either Empirical Approach (tunnel constructed from records of satisfactory past performance) or Analytical/Numerical Approach (fundamental approach with investigation of potential failure modes and component design to resist these failure modes).

 

So, what is the empirical approach? Well, it is nothing but based on experience. Rock Quality Designation (RQD) is used to characterize rock mass for initial ground support selection. Rock Mass Rating (RMR) (Geo-mechanics Classification) and Q-system is also used for classification. Based on this classification, support systems are decided. For hard and intact rock, light lining would be sufficient; for completely crushed chemically intact rocks, continuous support for lower end of ribs or circular ribs are needed; for swelling rocks, circular ribs with yielding support are needed. Figure 4 shows support recommendations for tunnels in rock based on RQD (after Deere et al. 1970).

 

 

Figure 4.1 Support Recommendations for tunnels in rock based on RQD (after Deere et al. 1970)

Figure 4.2 Support Recommendations for tunnels in rock based on RQD (after Deere et al. 1970)
Figure 4 Support Recommendations for tunnels in rock based on RQD (after Deere et al. 1970)

 

 

Classification of rock mass using RMR uses parameters: Rock Uniaxial Compressive Strength, Rock Quality Designation, Groundwater conditions, Discontinuity spacing, orientation and condition. Figure 5 shows RDSO recommendations for excavation and support in accordance with RMR system.

 

 

Figure 5 Recommendations for excavation and support of 10m Span Rock Tunnels in accordance with RMR System

Figure 5 Recommendations for excavation and support of 10m Span Rock Tunnels in accordance with RMR System

 

  1. The empirical methods provide ground support scheme based on explorations, observations and testing facts, which may be sometimes inadequate, so it is necessary to investigate the failure modes. Merely geologic characterization of rock mass should not be used to recommend ground support without examining failure modes. For example, failure due to corrosion of components, squeezing and swelling, overstressing of rocks, weathering and deterioration of rocks, ground water conditions, etc. need to be studied independently.

  2.  

    When talking about Analytical and Numerical Approach, individual support components like rockbolts, shotcrete, steel ribs, etc. are designed to resist the potential failure modes of the tunnel.

 

Figure 1. Metro Line Construction

 
 
 

 

4. What's Next?

 

By now you have well understood functioning of a tunnel boring machine and general design issues for a tunnel. In the upcoming articles, general design guidelines for NATM tunnels and structural design issues will be covered specifically.

 

Susbcribe
MIDAS Newsletter

Thank you, See you soon!
Share
About the Author
Pragati Saxena | Geotechnical Engineer | Midas R&D

Pragati is a Geotechnical Engineer associated with Midas R&D. She has received her postgraduate degree in Geotechnical Engineering at Indian Institute of Technology, Dhanbad, India. She has experience in numerical modelling related to slope safety investigation, earthen and gravity dams.

Comments
DOWNLOAD Download the Ebook

Fill out the below form to
download the Complete Guide to Composite Sections

All